iRubric: Fall prevention project rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Fall prevention project

Students were given a specific topic to study and then share with the class their findings. These findings are presented via some type of lab activity.

Rubric Code: U2477B

By ldmiller

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Medical

Type: Project

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Fall prevention
	Superior 4 pts	Excellent 3 pts	Satisfactory 2 pts	Poor 1 pts
Classroom work time usage This speaks to the time the students were given in class to work on preparation for this project	Superior Students used class time efficiently and effectively at every opportunity.	Excellent Students used class time efficiently and effectively most of the time.	Satisfactory Students used class time efficiently and effectively some of the time.	Poor Students used class time efficiently and effectively very little of the time.
In Class Presentation This speaks to presentation the students gave to the class.	Superior Students presented a superior presentation that well exceeded the criteria.	Excellent Students presented an excellent presentation that fit all of the criteria.	Satisfactory Students presented a satisfactory presentation that fit most of the criteria.	Poor Students presented a poor presentation that fit few of the criteria.
Teaching lab This speaks to how the students exposed the class to their topic via a lab experience. (TRIPLE POINTS)	Superior The students were superior in seeing that all participants were actively involved in the lab experience.	Excellent The students were excellent in seeing that most participants were actively involved in the lab experience.	Satisfactory The students were satisfactory in seeing that some participants were actively involved in the lab experience.	Poor The students were poor in seeing that few participants were actively involved in the lab experience.
Lab Experience This speaks to the actual lab the students planned for their classmates to experience. (DOUBLE POINTS)	Superior The lab well exceeded the criteria. It had superior planning and content.	Excellent The lab fit all of the criteria. It had excellent planning and content.	Satisfactory The lab fit most of the criteria. It was satisfactory in planning and content.	Poor The lab fit few of the criteria. It was poor in planning and content.