iRubric: Group Presentation Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Group Presentation Rubric

This rubric is designed to assess the presentation of the group activity. The rubric should consider the performance of the group as a whole, as well as individual contributions.

Rubric Code: TX95W49

By sholland

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: History

Type: Project

Grade Levels: (none)

Group Presentation Rubric
	Excellent 5 pts	Good 3 pts	Fair 1 pts	Poor 0 pts
Organization	Excellent Presentation was very organized and was very easy to follow. Transitions between group members were well planned and executed cleanly.	Good Presentation was fairly organized and pretty followable. Transitions might have been slightly discontinuous but did not take away greatly from the overall presentation.	Fair Presentation was not clearly organized. Transitions between members were jumpy or awkward.	Poor Presentation lacked organization. Poor transitions between group members individual parts. Presentation lacked order and very difficult to follow.
Teamwork/Participation	Excellent •Holds attention of entire audience with the use of direct eye contact, seldom looking at notes • Speaks with fluctuation in volume and inflection to maintain audience interest and emphasize key points	Good • Consistent use of direct eye contact with audience, but still returns to notes • Speaks with satisfactory variation of volume and inflection	Fair • Displays minimal eye contact with audience, while reading mostly from the notes • Speaks in uneven volume with little or no inflection	Poor • Holds no eye contact with audience, as entire report is read from notes • Speaks in low volume andor monotonous tone, which causes audience to disengage
Content	Excellent Group members had a stronghold on the content and content was thoroughly addressed. No mistakes were made with regard to content knowledge.	Good Most of the group members has a solid understanding of the content. Content missing minor elements or contained minor errors.	Fair Group members had only a superficial understanding of content. Several mistakes were made during the presentation.	Poor Group members had little to no understanding of the content addressed in the presentation.
Visual Aid(s)	Excellent Visual aids used were used effectively throughout presentation. Group members used visual aids as a supplement, not as a crutch.	Good Visual aids used were somewhat effective, but weren't used consistently thoughout presentation.	Fair Visual aids used did not support verbal presentation. They lacked information, or groups members read from them.	Poor Visual aids were not used at all.
Questioning	Excellent Group members were able to answer all questions with full understanding of the topic.	Good Group members were able to answer the 1 or more of the questions, but the understanding of the topic did not prove to be evident in answer.	Fair Group members were able to answer only 1 question.	Poor Group was unable to answer any questions.
Participation	Excellent NAME_________________ NAME_________________ NAME_________________	Good NAME_________________ NAME_________________ NAME_________________	Fair NAME_________________ NAME_________________ NAME_________________	Poor NAME_________________ NAME_________________ NAME_________________
TOTALS	Excellent POSTER	Good ADDED ELEMENT	Fair QUESTIONING	Poor PRESENTATION

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric