iRubric: Dante Project/ Part 2 & 3 rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Dante Project/ Part 2 & 3

Dante's Inferno Project. Contains 5 parts of the project both individual and group work is involved. This rubric covers part 2 & 3, quotes and significant passages, and the art review. EACH GROUP will turn one in. Original Rubric by Sarah Moore. Project ideas adapted from amphi.com

Rubric Code: TX4239X

By MissMoore

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: English

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 9-12

Dante Project/ Part 2&3
	Poor 5 pts	Fair 15 pts	Good 25 pts
QUOTES AND PASSAGES	Poor Less than 3 passages are explained. Explanation lacks coherency and does not relate to the context. Improper formatting.	Fair less than 5 passages are identified. Exact quotes aren't clear. Literary terms of the elements are not completely evident. Formatting is slightly incorrect.	Good 5 passages are identified. The exact quote is included. The explanation of the passage's significance and context is explained thoroughly. The literary elements are explained using various literary terms found throughout the text. Proper APA format. 12 point font. Times New Roman. Presented in chart format.
FORMAT	Poor Students shows very little evidence of APA Style formatting. Title page, summary, bibliography are inaccurate.	Fair Paper demonstrates partial formatting in APA Style. Some formatting is inaccurate; i.e. title page, bibliography.	Good Paper is in APA style format with a title page. Proper bullets are used. 12 point font. Times New Roman. Sources are credible and citations are accurate. Citations and references are accurate and bibliography listed on final page of paper in proper format.
SPELLING AND GRAMMAR	Poor 6-10 Spelling and grammatical errors found. Paper shows little evidence of proofreading.	Fair 4-5 spelling or grammatical errors found. Paper lacks proofreading.	Good Perfect spelling and grammar. Paper has been proofread and shows no errors in grammar or spelling. Good overall mechanics of writing.
ART REVIEW	Poor Review does not relate to the material being assessed. Shows little to no coherency. Poor format and little to no structure.	Fair Summary is slightly unclear and does not provide a clear thesis statement. The assessment of the material isn't concise and/or coherent. Review does not show proper formatting and/or lacking the intro, body, and/or conclusion.	Good A concise summary of the content is evident, including a relevant description of the topic, as well as its overall perspective, argument, or purpose. A critical assessment of the material is included. The statement should be in paragraph format with proper APA format. Statement will include a thesis statement, supporting body, and a conclusion.