iRubric: Written Analysis-Writing to ARGUE. rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Written Analysis-Writing to ARGUE.

Make a claim and support it with evidence

Rubric Code: T94434

By wendyg13

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: History

Type: Writing

Grade Levels: 6-8

Essay
	Exceeding-Excellent 4 pts	Meeting-Good 3 pts	Developing-Fair 2 pts	Emerging-Poor 1 pts
Introduction	Exceeding-Excellent Hook, Background info, and strong thesis is present	Meeting-Good Good general hook, info and thesis	Developing-Fair Missing hook, information, or weak thesis	Emerging-Poor intro is missing or minimal
Body Content	Exceeding-Excellent Makes a strong claim and supports it with detailed historical evidence	Meeting-Good good general claim and has evidence to support it	Developing-Fair needs more specificity in reason and evidence	Emerging-Poor lacks supporting evidence
Commentary/Analysis	Exceeding-Excellent Shows strong critical thinking skills and ample commentary sentences	Meeting-Good good critical thinking skills present; enough commentary sentences	Developing-Fair needs more analysis and critical thinking	Emerging-Poor missing or hardly any commentary or analysis present
Organization	Exceeding-Excellent flows together into a cohesive essay; transitions used	Meeting-Good good general flow; may need more transitions	Developing-Fair choppy in places; may jump around	Emerging-Poor completely disorganized
Writing	Exceeding-Excellent Exhibits strong writing skills and minimal writing errors	Meeting-Good good writing skills; has some writing errors	Developing-Fair writing errors start to detract from the paper	Emerging-Poor numerous writing errors make the essay difficult to read
Conclusion	Exceeding-Excellent Strong conclusion offers a finished feeling and is all commentary	Meeting-Good good general conclusion; may need more of the "big picture" reflection	Developing-Fair conclusion needs more work; short or lacks commentary	Emerging-Poor missing or weak conclusion