iRubric: Annotated Bibliography Rubric

There are few or no errors in mechanics, usage, grammar or spelling. The title of the work and evidence from the work are correctly capitalized and punctuated throughout.

There are some errors in mechanics, usage, grammar, or spelling. Most conventions related to capitalizing and puncuating the title of the work and supplying evidence from the work are followed.

There are several errors in mechanics, usage, grammar, or spelling. Only some of the conventions related to capitalizing and punctuating the title of the work and supplying evidence from the work are followed.

There are many serious errors in mechanics, usage, grammar, and spelling. Few or none of the conventions related to capitalizing and punctuating the title of the work and supplying evidence from the work are followed.

Writer skillfully summarizes the major theme/thesis or argument of each source. May include a SOAPS like analysis. Thorough. Uses transitions to lead from one idea to the next. Audience can see the utility of the source based on writer's insight presented.

Writer summarizes the major theme/thesis or argument of each source. May include a SOAPS like analysiNot as thorough as Exceeds.

Writer summarizes the major theme/thesis or argument of each source. May include a SOAPS likfe analysis. Fair. missing pertinent information or glosses over information included in the source.

Writer summarizes the major theme/thesis or argument of each source. May include a SOAPS likfe analysis. Missing pertinent information or glosses over information included in the source. Too short to see the value of the source, especially considering the fact that all sources have been previously read.