iRubric: The Floating and Sinking Objects Final Project Rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

The Floating and Sinking Objects Final Project Rubric

iRubric for Students Technology-Based Final Project

Rubric Code: T25XWC4

By Smontano2024

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: Science

Type: Project

Grade Levels: K-5

Criteria / Standard
	Excellent 25 pts	Proficient 20 pts	Developing 15 pts	Beginning 10 pts	Not Completed 0 pts
CPALMS, SC.3.P.8.2	Excellent Level 4 The student thoroughly explained mass, volume, and why objects float or sink with accurate and well researched information.	Proficient Level 3 The student had explained mass, volume, and floating/sinking objects with mostly accurate info.	Developing Level 2 The student had a basic explanation of mass and volume; some inaccuracies.	Beginning Level 1 The students explanation was either missing, unclear, or mostly inaccurate.	Not Completed No Attempt
ISTE Knowledge Constructor 1.3A	Excellent Level 4 The student used multiple sources effectively and their information fully supports learning.	Proficient Level 3 The student had used credible sources; info generally supports learning.	Developing Level 2 The student had used limited or partly credible sources; info at times irrelevant.	Beginning Level 1 The student had used few to no credible sources; information is mostly irrelevant or incorrect.	Not Completed No Attempt
ISTE Computational Thinker 1.3D	Excellent Level 4 The student clearly connected their project to real-world scenarios and their explanations are insightful.	Proficient Level 3 The student connects project to real-world problems with explanations.	Developing Level 2 The student included some connection to real-world problems but explanations were weak.	Beginning Level 1 The student had no clear connection to real-world problems or their explanation was missing.	Not Completed No Attempt
ISTE Computational Thinker 1.5A	Excellent Level 4 The student clearly defines the issue, collects and analyzes data accurately; draws strong conclusions.	Proficient Level 3 The student defined problem and analyzes data with minor errors; conclusions mostly clear	Developing Level 2 The students definitions or data analysis was incomplete or somewhat unclear.	Beginning Level 1 The students problem was not defined; data missing or not analyzed; no conclusions.	Not Completed No Attempt
Presentation Design & Visuals	Excellent Level 4 The student presented with a neat, well-organized PowerPoint that included relevant, high-quality pictures enhancing their understanding.	Proficient Level 3 The student had a well organized PowerPoint with pictures that supported their content.	Developing Level 2 The student was somewhat organized; visuals present but limited or low quality.	Beginning Level 1 The student was extremely disorganized or had an incomplete PowerPoint; few or no relevant visuals.	Not Completed No Attempt
GPS (grammar, spelling, and punctuation)	Excellent Level 4 The students writing was very clear with no or very few minor errors.	Proficient Level 3 The students writing had some errors but their meaning is mostly clear.	Developing Level 2 The student had frequent errors that occasionally confused the real meaning.	Beginning Level 1 The student had numerous errors within their project that significantly impaired understanding.	Not Completed No Attempt

Subjects:

Science

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric