iRubric: Economics Project Yr 12.4Y rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Economics Project Yr 12.4Y

Economics Project Yr 12

Adopted from http://www.ncsu.edu/midlink/rub.pres.html

Rubric Code: SXW4C88

By RABEECHER

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Business

Type: Presentation

Grade Levels: 9-12, Undergraduate, Graduate

Presentation Rubric
	Poor 0-3 points (N/A)	Average 4-5 points (N/A)	Good 6-8 points (N/A)	Excellent 9-10 points (N/A)
Teamwork	Poor All students of the group work separately and productively in producing and/or presenting the project.	Average Some students works with other students in either producing the project OR in delivering presentation.	Good Each student of the group works with other students in either producing the project OR in delivering presentation.	Excellent Each student of the group works with other students in producing the project AND in delivering presentation.
Audience Engagement	Poor Student reads all of report with no eye contact. Does not answer questions from the floor.	Average Student occasionally uses eye contact, but still reads most of report. Answers at least one question well.	Good Student maintains eye contact most of the time but frequently returns to notes. Answers a number of questions from the floor.	Excellent Student maintains eye contact with audience, seldom returning to notes, answers and encourages questions from the floor.
Imagination	Poor Project does not incorporates imaginative categories for making judgment.	Average Project incorporates imaginative categories, without justification.	Good Project incorporates imaginative categories, with some justification.	Excellent Project incorporates imaginative categories, with full justification.
Subject Knowledge	Poor Groups present basic relevant economic ideas or facts.	Average Groups present basic relevant economic ideas or facts with confidence	Good Groups present a range of relevant economic ideas or facts with confidence.	Excellent Groups present a range of relevant economic ideas or facts with confidence and fluency.
Quality of information	Poor Information is not well sourced, relevant and cited.	Average Some information is either well sourced, relevant and cited.	Good Information is mostly well sourced, relevant and cited.	Excellent All information is well sourced, relevant and cited.
Application of knowledge	Poor No evidence is supplied.	Average Evidence is supplied for two countries effectively.	Good audience can follow. Evidence is supplied for each country.	Excellent Range of evidence is supplied for each country.
Evaluative judgment	Poor Group do not justify final results table.	Average Some justification for results, without evidence.	Good Results are mostly justified, limited amount of evidence is used.	Excellent Final results are fully justified and follow logically from full range of evidence.

Subjects:

Types:

Presentation

Discuss this rubric