iRubric: Janine Weisman - Government: Prime Minister rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Janine Weisman - Government: Prime Minister

Government: Prime Minister

Rubric Code: SXC9C34

By Kevin1952

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Communication

Type: Presentation

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Prime Minister
	Poor 1.5 pts	Fair 2.85 pts	Good 3.45 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Constructive Speech time 4-5 min. with 30 sec grace period over alloed	Poor Constructive phase time: 3:29 or under or 6:01 or over	Fair Constructive phase time: 3:30-3:44 or 5:46-6:00	Good Constructive phase time: 3:45-3:59 or 5:31-5:45	Excellent Constructive phase time: 4-5:30
Prime Minister Constructive Responsibilities: Greet judges & class State resolution clearly Use anecdote, illustration or example to get audience's attention and develop interest in case Define terms, give context & background if needed Outline main points clearly and provide brief discussion for each point. Clarify what makes case important	Poor Failed to acknowledged judges, class & opposing team; did not state resolution clearly No attention getter Left terms undefined Gave no explanations, anecdotes, examples to interest audience in topic of debate Outlined only 1 main point and provided brief, vague discussion with little detail or supporting evidence	Fair Acknowledged judges, class & opposing team; stated resolution clearly Used attention getter Only gave vague definitions Gave no explanations, anecdotes, examples to interest audience in topic of debate Outlined at least 2 main points and provided brief discussion for each point.	Good Acknowledged judges, class & opposing team; stated resolution clearly Used attention getter Offered explanations, anecdotes, examples to interest audience in topic of debate; made topic salient Defined terms used Outlined at least 3 main points clearly and provide brief discussion for each point.	Excellent Acknowledged judges, class & opposing team; stated resolution clearly Used effective attention getter Clearly defined terms used Offered clear explanations, anecdotes, examples to interest audience in topic of debate; made topic salient Outlined at least 3 main points clearly with signposting and provided brief discussion for each point.
Rebuttal Speech time 2-3 min.	Poor Rebuttal phase time: 1:29 or under	Fair Rebuttal phase time: 1:30-1:44 or 3:31+	Good Rebuttal phase time: 1:45-1:49	Excellent Rebuttal phase time: 2-3:30
Prime Minister Rebuttal Responsibilities: Review progress of debate through constructive phase Rebuild Gov't case Show clash with Opp side Outline reasons why Gov't case must win Outline reasons why Opp. side should lose Memorable ending	Poor Failed to refute points; showed no clash with other team; no sense of an ending; confusing or vague	Fair Missed some opportunities to refute points presented by Opposition; left some arguments by other team unaddressed; abrupt ending	Good Mostly effective in rebuilding case; mostly organized presentation of main points; addressed all of the other team's points; good ending	Excellent Effectively rebuilt case and stated why Gov't should win debate; clearly showed where clash exists; well-organized presentation of points with clear signposting; very memorable ending
Delivery	Poor Very little eye contact; multiple awkward moments; failed to connect with audience; was offensive to other team or audience	Fair Awkward pauses; volume not loud enough at times; spoke in monotone with no variation in pitch, pacing; showed respect to other team	Good Mostly confident; spoke clearly and deliberately; good eye contact; respectful of other team	Excellent Confident speaker; excellent eye contact; effectively used humor; successfully invoked ethos, pathos, logos; engaged audience; respectful of other team
Preparation	Poor Showed little knowledge of topic No debate flow notes submitted	Fair Showed fair amount of knowledge of topic Submitted flow notes of debate	Good Showed good amount of knowledge of topic Submitted flow notes of debate	Excellent Well-informed on topic; offered background information when needed Submitted flow notes of debate
Bibliography Responsibilities: *4 sources properly formatted APA style uploaded to assignment on Bridges before start of class on scheduled debate day. When in doubt place in dropbox!	Poor Cited 1 source, did not follow formatting, supplied only a list of links	Fair Cited 2 sources, did not follow formatting	Good Cited 3+ sources, somewhat followed APA style	Excellent Cited 4 sources in proper APA style formatting

Subjects:

Communication

Types:

Presentation

Discuss this rubric