Skip to main content

- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Classroom Teacher Interview Rating Scale rubric

iRubric: Classroom Teacher Interview Rating Scale rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Classroom Teacher Interview Rating Scale Teacher Interview Rating Scale Interview rubric for classroom teaching positions. Rubric Code: SXA8W24 By lstoneking Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Education Type: Reading Grade Levels: K-5

Candidate Interview Rubric
	Unsatisfactory 1 pts	Needs Improvement 5 pts	Proficient 7 pts	Excellent 10 pts	Notes: (N/A)
INTRODUCTION Introduction of committee members; and position priorities [resource for teachers when they need help with students, curriculum etc; provide high quality intruction to T2 and T3 students; being able to assess and diagnose within the reading scope and sequence]. Tell us a little about yourself and why you would be the best candidate for this position. Laura S.	Unsatisfactory	Needs Improvement	Proficient	Excellent	Notes:
Curriculum Knowledge Engaging Students in Learning. How do you plan for instruction that increase the learning of readers? How do you ensure that the reading program supports rather than inhibits learning and teaching? Erin	Unsatisfactory Is unable to identify problems/solutions in the teaching of struggling readers. Cannot speak to how to best support teachers and students in the classroom when students struggle in reading/	Needs Improvement May have some knowledge of planning processes and/or instruction that accelerates student learning and supports teachers in the teaching of reading.	Proficient Has knowledge of instruction that accelerates student learning speaks to planning processes that support increased student learning. May, or may not, be able to tell how to provide assistance to teachers in class with reading strategies and interventions.	Excellent Has a knowledge of,and exhibits a high level of skill in all aspects of instruction that accelerates student learning. Speaks to several planning processes which supports increased student learning. Provides assistance to teachers in overcoming problems in reading they may encounter in class.	Notes:
Teaching Experience/ History What recent knowledge have you acquired regarding reading/writing instruction in particular. Tell me about a professional challenge you have faced and how did you resolve this challenge. Are there specific programs you are certified in and how do you see yourself applying these k-5. Michael	Unsatisfactory Candidate has no teaching experience at elementary level Candidate has no work history in literacy education with the exception of student teaching Candidate has no academic accomplishments in the form of advanced degrees and/or educational trainings	Needs Improvement Candidate has less than 4 years of teaching experience at elementary level Candidate has limited work history in literacy education Candidate has little academic accomplishments in the form of advanced degrees and/or educational trainings	Proficient Candidate has 5-7 years of teaching experience at elementary level Candidate has adequate work history in literacy education Candidate has adequate academic accomplishments in the form of advanced degrees and/or educational trainings education	Excellent Candidate has more than 7 years of teaching experience at elementary level Candidate has extensive work history in literacy education	Notes:
Instruction How do you provide highly specialized reading instruction and what do you do to ensure that the results you seek are obtained? In your response, discuss how you organize the reading program to support school wide efforts for improving student performance and proficiency and how you ensure alignment of reading standards and instruction. In the situation where a student is not making adequate progress, how would you diagnose and what would you do to address this? Sam	Unsatisfactory Does not address the use of research based literacy strategies, or if addressed cannot identify any. Does not address the need to align instruction to reading standards or alignment with teacher or grade level units of study.	Needs Improvement May address research based literacy strategies, but may not be able to name or describe them.May speak of reading standards and/or the need for differentiation but does not speak specifically of how he/she would do this.	Proficient May speak to need for differentiated instruction. Alludes to research based literacy strategies, may not be specific examples. Aligns, or attempts to align lessons with reading standards. May, or may not, address the need to align lessons with teacher or grade level units of study.	Excellent Provides differentiated materials matched to student instructional levels. Promotes recognition of students as unique learners. Clearly identifies, uses and models research-based literacy strategies. Links efforts to academic vision and mission of school. Aligns reading instruction to reading standards as well as aligning with teacher/grade level units of study.	Notes:
Classroom Environment How do you provide highly specialized reading instruction and what do you do to ensure that the results you seek are obtained? In your response, discuss how you organize the reading program to support school wide efforts for improving student performance and proficiency and how you ensure alignment of reading standards and instruction. Laura M.	Unsatisfactory Does not address the use of research based literacy strategies, or if addressed cannot identify any. Does not address the need to align instruction to reading standards or alignment with teacher or grade level units of study.	Needs Improvement May address research based literacy strategies, but may not be able to name or describe them.May speak of reading standards and/or the need for differentiation but does not speak specifically of how he/she would do this.	Proficient May speak to need for differentiated instruction. Alludes to research based literacy strategies, may not be specific examples. Aligns, or attempts to align lessons with reading standards. May, or may not, address the need to align lessons with teacher or grade level units of study.	Excellent Provides differentiated materials matched to student instructional levels. Promotes recognition of students as unique learners. Clearly identifies, uses and models research-based literacy strategies. Links efforts to academic vision and mission of school. Aligns reading instruction to reading standards as well as aligning with teacher/grade level units of study.	Notes:
Planning & Preparation How do you determine the success of the reading program for which you are responsible? How do you use any data collected to support your responsibilities as Reading Specialist? Erin	Unsatisfactory Able to clearly describe how they evaluate the efficacy of the program/approach , using data from a variety of sources that accurately reflects the content being assessed. Is able to enunciate a clear and reasonable response to intervention when the data shows a needed change (includes review of student data, teacher evaluation data, and processes for providing feedback to teachers).	Needs Improvement Able to describe how they determine the success of a program/approach. May include discussion of student data and teacher feedback or teacher evaluation of student growth.	Proficient May be able to identify information used to determine success of a program/approach but cannot offer specific response to interventions strategies or does not speak of student data, teacher feedback, or evaluation.	Excellent Candidate has extensive academic accomplishments in the form of advanced degrees and educational trainings	Notes:
Communication Skills What are the qualities of an effective coaching conversation. Describe challenges that you would expect to face in your role as a Reading/Writing Specialist. How would handle and/or address these challenges? Jess P.	Unsatisfactory Candidate struggles to express him/herself effectively and relate personally.	Needs Improvement Candidate is moderatly able to express him/herself effectively and relate personally.	Proficient Candidate seems comfortable in the ability to express him/herself effectively and relate personally.	Excellent Candidate demonstrates excellence in the ability to express him/herself effectively and relate personally.	Notes:
DATA What experiences do you have from using screenings. How do you communicate and/or share out data to both parents and teachers. Sam	Unsatisfactory	Needs Improvement	Proficient	Excellent	Notes:
Career Plans/Goals What indicators would you consider as demonstration of success as the Reading/Writing Specialist in this school. Where di you see the role of the Reading/Writing specialist in the RtI/MTSS prosess. Laura M.	Unsatisfactory Candidate demonstrated no criterion success of the Reading/Writing program.	Needs Improvement Candidate has some ideas of criterion or indicators of the success of the Reading/Writing program.	Proficient Candidate has direction of criterion or indicators of the success of the Reading/Writing program.	Excellent Candidate has detailed plans and criterion that demonstrate criterion or indicators of success, areas of growth, of the Reading/Writing program.	Notes:
Overall Impression	Unsatisfactory My overall impression is that this candidate may NOT be a fit fot for Simonds/KRSD.	Needs Improvement My overall impression is that this candidate would be a good choice for Simonds/KRSD.	Proficient My overall impression is that this candidate would be a great choice for Simonds/KRSD.	Excellent My overall impression is that this candidate would be an excellent choice for Simonds/KRSD.	Notes:
points tallied	Unsatisfactory	Needs Improvement	Proficient	Excellent	Notes: TOTAL POINTS:

Keywords:

Interview

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Vocational rubrics

More Reading rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.

n98