iRubric: Frankenstein Lens Analysis rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Frankenstein Lens Analysis

Frankenstein Literary Analysis Rubric

Student-created Essential Questions

Rubric Code: SX95855

By PVHarmon

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: English

Type: Writing

Grade Levels: 9-12

Enter rubric title Enter rubric description
	A 20-18 1 pts	B 17-16 1 pts	C 15-14 1 pts	<D 13-Below 1 pts
Introduction Hook, creativity in lead and title	A Creative hook -Introduces the author and title fluidly CREATIVE TITLE	B -Introduces author -Introduces title CREATIVE TITLE	C -Author and title mentioned, but not clearly stated BLAND TITLE	<D -Missing author and title NO TITLE OR "FRANKENSTEIN ESSAY" OR SIMILAR EFFORT
Thesis Lenses, connections to text, understanding of assignment and parameters	A Clear,well developed. Integrates class text with overarching research concept. Demonstrates strong understanding of assignment and parameters	B Clear. References class text with overarching research concept. Demonstrates understanding of assignment and parameters	C Lacking clarity. Attempted connection between class text with overarching research concept. Show effort at understanding assignment and parameters	<D Unclear concept Demonstrates little to no understanding the class text/assignment requirements and parameters
Organization/Topic Sentences Clarity, Fluidity	A Supports thesis, remains focused, insightful discussion. Topic sentences clear, connected to thesis. Creative transitions to provide a natural flow to the essay.	B Organized into sub-topics that explore the text and support the thesis. Smooth transitions	C Unclear or loses focus. Weak transitions	<D Not organized into sub-topics that focus on one aspect. Poor or lacking transitions
Body paragraphs Connections, Support, analysis	A All contain topic, explanation, evidence, analysis, clearly related to thesis. creatively uses domain-specific language and rhetorical devices	B Most contain topic, explanation, evidence, analysis, related to thesis. Uses domain-specific language and rhetorical devices	C Some contain topic, explanation, evidence, analysis,somewhat related to thesis. Infrequent/weak use of domain-specific language and rhetorical devices	<D Few, if any, contain topic, explanation, evidence, or analysis, not related to thesis.Does not use domain-specific language orrhetorical devices
Scholarly Evidence Sources are vetted for credibility (no blogs/wiki)	A Utilizes four external sources that offer support for the thesis and are creatively introduced. At least 2 are journal articles/books Vetted sources	B Utilizes four outside sources that clearly support the thesis. > 2 are journal articles/books Vetted sources	C Fewer than four external sources. Source material does not adequately support thesis. > 2 are journal articles/books Not all sources vetted	<D Fewer than four sources. Sources do not support thesis. > 2 are journal articles/books Invalid sources
Conclusion Clarity and Interest to readers	A Wraps up the essay by leaving the reader thinking. The conclusion is creative and/or thoughtful.	B Leaves the reader with something to think about.	C Restates the thesis.	<D Missing or irrelevant
Criteria-format 6-8 pages ALL work is student's own	A 6-8 pages 12 point Times New Roman 1" margins No title page Name, Block, date single-spaced, right-justified (ALL OR NOTHING FOR THIS)	B	C	<D
Spelling and grammar Proofreading	A Minimal errors in spelling and grammar throughout the essay.	B Very few errors in spelling and grammar, but do not interfere with meaning	C Multiple errors in spelling and grammar show little effort in editing and proofreading.	<D Many spelling and grammatical errors detract significantly from the essay.
MLA Formatting Internal and Cited page	A No errors	B Minimal errors	C Errors/omissions	<D 4 or more errors/omissions

Subjects:

English

Types:

Writing

Discuss this rubric