iRubric: Brand Director - Performance Department rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Brand Director - Performance Department

Program Director/Music Director

Rubric Code: SX6XCB2

By BCITRadio

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Education

Type: Project

Grade Levels: Undergraduate, Graduate

Brand Director - Performance
	Poor 0 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Evolution Program Logs 25 %	Poor Daily program logs are not completed or are missing proper log elements.	Fair Daily program logs are somewhat complete and include some proper log elements.	Good Daily program logs are complete and include some proper log elements.	Excellent Daily program logs are always complete and include all proper log elements.
Music Library Maintenance 25 %	Poor Student did not attend Music Committee Meeting. No songs added to Selector have run time, intro time, cold/fade ending, Canadian content notation, or composer information entered. No songs added to MTS have an intro time and EOM set. Selector music categories illogically reorganized.	Fair Minimal number of songs added to Selector have correct run time, intro time, cold/fade ending, Canadian content notation, and composer information entered. Minimal number of songs added to MTS have correct intro time and EOM set. Selector music categories somewhat reasonably reorganized.	Good Most songs added to Selector have correct run time, intro time, cold/fade ending, Canadian content notation, and composer information entered. Most songs added to MTS have correct intro time and EOM set. Selector music categories reasonably reorganized.	Excellent All songs added to Selector have correct run time, intro time, cold/fade ending, Canadian content notation, and composer information. Most songs added to MTS have correct intro time and EOM set. Selector music categories logically reorganized.
Ops Meeting Report 15 %	Poor Poor eye contact, voice projection or posture during report. Report is disorganized and seems unprepared. Incoherent, audience lost interest and could not determine the points of the report.	Fair Presentation and delivery were average. Report is hard to understand and lacks a coherent sequence. Some related facts, but went off topic and lost the audience. Mostly presented facts with little or no imagination.	Good Eye contact, voice projection and posture in presentation were very good. Information is presented in a logical sequence. Presented the facts with some interesting "twists". Held the audience's attention most of the time.	Excellent Presentation and delivery excellent with superb eye contact, voice projection and confident posture. Information is presented in a logical, interesting sequence. Involved the audience in the report in a positive way. Points made in a creative way and held the audience's attention
Day to Day Operations 15 %	Poor Fault report binder is never checked and/or noted faults not acted upon. MTS and SoundCloud not checked for daily podcasts being uploaded. Workroom and studios not clean and tidy before 4 pm.	Fair Fault report binder is seldom checked and/or noted faults seldom acted upon. MTS and SoundCloud seldom checked for daily podcasts being uploaded. Workroom and studios seldom clean and tidy before 4 pm.	Good Fault report binder is sometimes checked and/or noted faults sometimes acted upon. MTS and SoundCloud sometimes checked for daily podcasts being uploaded. Workroom and studios sometimes clean and tidy before 4 pm.	Excellent Fault report binder is always checked and/or noted faults always acted upon. MTS and SoundCloud always checked for daily podcasts being uploaded. Workroom and studios always clean and tidy before 4 pm.
Organizational Skills 10 %	Poor Consistent problems with organization and preparation. Rarely prepared for lab or is late to lab. Has to be redirected regularly to use time in lab for school work.	Fair Semi-regularly comes to lab unprepared or is tardy to lab on a frequent basis. Has some problems using lab time, and it is having an effect on student meeting standards.	Good Regularly is prepared for lab. May occasionally forget something, but not in a way that is disruptive to the learning process. Uses lab in a way that is productive most of the time.	Excellent Consistently organized. Characterized by being ready at the beginning of lab without reminder. Always or almost always uses lab to the best extent possible.
Teamwork 10 %	Poor Student is regularly or consistently unable to work with other students. Regularly is uncooperative with staff, disrupting learning for self and others.	Fair Inconsistently is able to work with others. Will only work with certain peers when directed. Sporadically will be cooperative with staff. This inconsistency gets in the way of student ability to meet standards.	Good Models teamwork and cooperation. Has problems working with others or cooperating with staff on occasion only. Can get back to work when redirected	Excellent Consistently works well with others. Can work with most anyone without conflict. Is a team player and cooperative with both students and staff.

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric