iRubric: Italian Research paper rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Italian Research paper

Research the approved topic. Submit a 2-3 page typed paper, double spaced, 12 point font following MLA guidelines. Include a bibliography citing at least 3-4 resources used in your paper(use quotes from all). You are encouraged to interject your personal opinion into this paper. A brief presentation will also make up the final grade.

Rubric Code: SX6W64W

By nherrera220

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Education

Type: Writing

Grade Levels: 9-12, Undergraduate

Research Paper
	Excellent 20 pts	Good 15 pts	Fair 10 pts	Poor 5 pts
Quality of research	Excellent --Cited 3-4 or more sources --Sources reliable and properly cited. --All information relevant to topic --Sufficient information provided to support all elements of topic. --Research in-depth and the beyond the obvious, revealing new insights gained.	Good --Cited 2 sources --Sources mostly reliable. Citation errors minor. --Most information relevant to thesis. --Sufficient information provided --Research of sufficient depth.	Fair --Failed to cite 1-2 sources --Source reliability questionable. Omitted information does not interfere with ability of reader to find the source. --Some information relevant to thesis. --Information provided to support some elements of topic --Surface research.	Poor --Failed to cite any sources --Source reliability questionable. Omitted information does not interfere with ability of reader to find the source. --Some information relevant to thesis. --Information provided to support some elements of topic. --Surface research.
Content	Excellent --Topic interesting, of appropriate breadth for length of paper & an appropriate topic for research. --Support for thesis complex, complete, & in-depth. --Writer involved with subject, not merely doing an assignment. --Clear and appropriate organization, with effective transitions, introduction, and conclusion.	Good --Topic somewhat broad or narrow for length of paper and/or a questionable topic for research. --Support for thesis sufficient, but lacking in depth or complexity. --Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion slightly lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.	Fair --Topic too broad or narrow for length of paper and/or a poor topic for research. --Support for thesis barely sufficient. --Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.	Poor --Topic too broad or narrow for length of paper and/or a poor topic for research. --Support for thesis barely sufficient, and/or. --Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
Works Cited/Bibliography MLA format	Excellent --All sources properly cited in both paper and bibliography. -- No more errors in format or punctuation.	Good --All sources properly cited in both paper and bibliography. -- 2 errors in format or punctuation.	Fair --Not all sources properly cited in both paper and bibliography. -- More than than 3 errors in format or punctuation.	Poor Not all sources properly cited in both paper and bibliography.< -- More than than 4 errors in format or punctuation
Grammar and Mechanics	Excellent --Consistent and appropriate voice. -- Sophisticated and precise word choice. --No spelling errors. --No errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense. -- No punctuation or capitalization errors. --Met all style and min/max page requirements	Good -- Voice mostly consistent and appropriate. -- Fairly effective word choice. --No more than 2 spelling errors. --Fewer than 1 errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense. -- Fewer than 2 punctuation or capitalization errors. --Met most style and min/max page requirements	Fair -- Voice somewhat consistent and appropriate. -- Correct word choice. --More than 3 spelling errors. --More than 2 errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense. -- More than 3 punctuation or capitalization errors. Failed to meet style and/or min/max page requirements	Poor -- Voice somewhat consistent and appropriate. -- Correct word choice. --More than 4 spelling errors. --More than 3 errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense. -- More than 4 punctuation or capitalization errors. Failed to meet style and/or min/max page requirements
Presentation no more than 5 min.	Excellent Student's presentation demonstrated deep understanding of research and facts found. -Included bibliography.	Good Student's presentation demonstrated overall understanding of research and facts found. -Included bibliography.	Fair Student's presentation demonstrated basic understanding of research and facts found. -Included bibliography with some errors	Poor Student's presentation demonstrated little to no understanding of research and facts found. -Included bibliography with errors or none.

Keywords:

Research paper - emphasis on relevance of research

Subjects:

Education

Types:

Writing

Discuss this rubric