iRubric: MY TV SHOW HAS VALUE! rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

MY TV SHOW HAS VALUE!

Romeo and Juliet-Who's to Blame?

Narrative: My TV Show is the best.

Rubric Code: SX5WAW9

By ctelschow

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: English

Type: Writing

Grade Levels: 9-12

Debate: TV SHOW VALUE
	Advanced 4 pts	Proficient 3 pts	Progressing 2 pts	Beginning 1 pts
MLA Format	Advanced The paper is formatted with adherance to MLA Style. The paper has proper line spacing, common font, proper heading, proper header and proper title.	Proficient The paper is mostly formatted with adherance to MLA Style but is lacking either a proper heading, proper line spacing, common font, proper heading, header and title.	Progressing The paper is lacking in it's adherance to MLA formatting and is missing multiple requirements for formatting.	Beginning Little to no attention was given to MLA formatting requirements
Thesis	Advanced The thesis statement is clear and focused and identifies the issue to be discussed.	Proficient The thesis statement is somewhat clear but could use some further development.	Progressing The thesis is unclear or hard to identify.	Beginning There is no thesis statement or it does not function as a thesis statement.
Organization	Advanced The paper is engaging and focused. There is a strong introduction, focused body paragraphs and strong conclusion.	Proficient The paper is mostly organized and easy to follow. Parts of the paper are adequate.	Progressing The paper is difficult to understand at times or is missing either an introduction or conclusion.	Beginning The paper is mostly difficult to understand or follow. Parts of the paper are missing.
Evidence and Support	Advanced Three or more specific text supported reasons to prove your argument.	Proficient Three or more reasons are stated but evidence is somewhat weak.	Progressing Two text supported reasons are stated and/or the evidence given are weak or confusing.	Beginning Only one text supported reason is given. No points will be awarded if there is no supporting evidence.
Refutation and Concessions	Advanced Acknowledges and responds to at least three viable counter- arguments that address the potential guilt of other characters.	Proficient Acknowledges and responds to at least three counter- arguments with limited viability that address the potential guilt of other characters.	Progressing Only two counter arguments are acknowleged or the the counter-arguments are weak.	Beginning Only one counnter-argument is acknowleded or the counter-arguments acknowledged do not make sense. No points will be awarded if no counter-arguments are included.
Conventions	Advanced The writer shows a strong control of grammar, spelling, and punctuation. Only one or two minor errors exist.	Proficient The writer is mostly in control of grammar, spelling, and punctuation. There are a few minor errors.	Progressing The writer has limited control of grammar, spelling, and punctuation. There are several errors, or if there are a few errors, they are major and interfere with comprehending the text.	Beginning The writer has very limited control of grammar, spelling, and punctuation. There are numerous errors and they interfere with comprehending the text.
Points for/against	Advanced QUESTIONS ANSWERED:	Proficient QUESTIONS PARTIALLY ANSWERED:	Progressing QUESTIONS UNANSWERED	Beginning QUESTIONS NOT CONSIDERED

Subjects:

English

Types:

Writing

Discuss this rubric