iRubric: TV News Segment rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

TV News Segment

Segment Rubric

Rubric Code: SX2X62X

By jcribb

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Communication

Type: Assessment

Grade Levels: 9-12, Undergraduate

Basic Shots Rubric
	Good 5 pts	Fair 3 pts	Poor 1 pts	Points Earned (N/A)
Pre Production	Good -signs of pre-production were clearly evident (well thought out idea, schedule, shot list, script, etc.)	Fair -some signs of pre-production were evident (well thought out idea, schedule, shot list, script, etc.)	Poor -no signs of pre-production were evident (well thought out idea, schedule, shot list, script, etc.)	Points Earned
Camera work	Good - In focus<BR> - Good exposure<BR> - Variety of shots<BR> - Shots are stable<BR> - Moves are motivated<BR> -Rule of Thirds was followed	Fair - Mostly in focus - Exposure mostly good - Some variety in shots - Shots are mostly stable - Moves are mostly motivated -Rule of Thirds was sometimes followed	Poor - Bad focus throughout - Poor exposure - Lacking shot variety - Footage is shaky - Moves unnecessary or not clearly motivated -Rule of Thirds was not followed	Points Earned
Audio	Good - Well captured - Correct use of microphones - Levels/mixing is appropriate - Music enhances scenes	Fair - Some audio issues - Mostly correct mic use - Levels/mixing correct most of the time - Music works or at least does not take away from the scenes	Poor - Major audio issues - Microphone use incorrect, non existent - Levels are off, mixing non existent or bad - Music choice not appropriate for the scene, distracting.	Points Earned
Lighting	Good - Appropriate exposure - Subjects are well lit - Lighting used to add to the mood - No back-lit subjects -Shots were white balanced	Fair - Mostly good exposure - Subjects generally well lit - Evidence of controlled lighting -Some shots were white balanced	Poor - Bad exposure - No lighting control - Subjects back-lit -Shots were not white balanced	Points Earned
Editing & Effects	Good - Editing appears seamless - No jump cuts - Effects used appropriately - Good pacing for the piece - Edits placed at good cut points	Fair - Some distractions in editing - One or two jump cuts - Mostly appropriate use of effects - Editing seems jumpy in some places - Cut points a little off occasionally - Timing seems off	Poor - Editing is messy - Lots of jump cuts - Too many effects, not used well - Editing doesn't make sense - No rhythm to editing - Black holes - Cut points missed	Points Earned
Storytelling & Content	Good -Story is easy to follow -Visuals and audio go well togeher to tell the story -story contains useful and relevant content for the intended audience and subject matter -Content is well researched, attributed and presented and goes beyond simple lists.	Fair -Story jumps around some but generally makes sense -Visuals and audio sometimes don't go together or don't make sense -story contains some useful and relevant content but also has some irrelevant and questionable content -Content is somewhat researched, has some attributions but tends toward obvious and easily obtained information	Poor -Story is jumbled and is hard to follow - Visuals and audio do not match or make sense -content does not offer the audience new or relevant information -- is obvious or easily found -there is little or no research or attributions - it's obvious that the story was thrown together at the last minute	Points Earned

Keywords:

TV News Segment

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric