iRubric: Article Presentation: Zoo Task #3 rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Article Presentation: Zoo Task #3

Students present an article that all of the students have read; they should connect the content and argument of the article to the current task: Do We Need Zoos?

Rubric Code: S9W22W

By Gtosto08

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: English

Type: Presentation

Grade Levels: 6-8, Undergraduate

Presentation of Article
	Far Below Standards 0-54 1 pts	Approcahing the Standards 55-64 2 pts	Meeting the Standards 65-84 3 pts	Far Above the Standards 85-99 4 pts
accurately conveys content	Far Below Standards Student can only loosely summarize some of the main points of the article but does not relate it to overall class discussion or the text (where relevant).	Approcahing the Standards Student is able to summarize some of the main points of the article and is somewhat able to relate it to the text (where relevant) and overall class discussion.	Meeting the Standards Student is able summarize the main points of the article and how it relates to the text (when relevant). The student can explain how the article relates to overall class discussion.	Far Above the Standards Student is able to clearly summarize the thesis, the main points, and the argument of the article and how it relates to the main text and the overall class discussion. Student is also able to elaborate on the importance of the article.
organization	Far Below Standards Organization is limited; introduces only the most essential points of the article. Presents no plan for presentation.	Approcahing the Standards Organization is understandable; introduces the main elements of the article; does not set clear plan for presentation.	Meeting the Standards Organization is clear and understandable; introduces the important elements of the article and how they are important. Sets plan for presentation.	Far Above the Standards Organization is clear and precise; clearly introduces the all the major elements of the article and how they are important and will relate to the presentation. Sets clear and logical plan for presentation.
critical assessment	Far Below Standards Does not explain the arguments of the article. Does not formulate opinion or argument about the article. No critical thinking is evident.	Approcahing the Standards Explains at a very basic level the arguments of the article; does not tie them to the text and/or class discussion. Does not formulate opinion or argument about the article. Little critical thinking is evident.	Meeting the Standards Understands and explains the arguments of the article; loosely ties them to the text and/or class discussion. Formulates some sort of opinion or argument about the article. Critical thinking is evident.	Far Above the Standards Clearly understands and explains the arguments of the article; ties them to the text and/or class discussion. Formulates own opinion or argument about the article and what it claims, especially with respect to ongoing class discourse. Strong critical thinking and originality are evident.
mechanics & citations	Far Below Standards Poor grammar, spelling, inaccurate or missing citations. Paraphrased material is not consistently attributed to source	Approcahing the Standards Grammar and spelling mostly adequate. Most quotes or paraphrased material are properly attributed.	Meeting the Standards Grammar and spelling have few errors. Quotes and paraphrased material are properly attributed.	Far Above the Standards Grammar and spelling are essentially flawless. All quotes and paraphrased material are properly attributed.
class discussion	Far Below Standards Group is unprepared to lead a class discussion on the article as demonstrated by the fact student has no questions to pose and/or no other ways of initiating discussion.	Approcahing the Standards Group can initiate general discussion on the article, but is unable to elaborate or otherwise respond to contribution made by other students to the discussion or questions posed by other students.	Meeting the Standards Group can initiate general discussion on the article and is able to accurately respond to contributions made by other students or questions posed by other students.	Far Above the Standards Group can initiate and develop a general discussion on the article. Student is able to respond to the contributions and questions of other students in a way that shows original and thoughtful thinking.

Keywords:

sociolinguistics

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric