Skip to main content

- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Reconstruction Perspectives rubric

iRubric: Reconstruction Perspectives rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Reconstruction Perspectives Discussion Board combines assessment for the forum, debate and summary Rubric Code: S8C225 By bobcat77 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: History Type: (Other) Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Voice Thread Debate 40 %
	Exceeds Expectations 13 pts	Meets Expectations 11 pts	Needs Improvement 9 pts	Below Expectations 7 pts
Posts: Question comprehension	Exceeds Expectations Post(s) show excellent understanding of question by making clear connections and references to other materials, and connecting specific examples of personal experience to concepts.	Meets Expectations Post(s) show understanding of question by making a connection or reference to other materials, and/or a personal experience connected to a concept.	Needs Improvement Post(s) shows partial or limited understanding of question with vague connections to other materials or personal experience.	Below Expectations Post(s) shows little or no understanding of the question with no connections to other materials or personal experience.
Concept Mastery	Exceeds Expectations Post(s) shows excellent understanding of concept and deep insight into the material. Opinions offered strongly reflect the perspective of character and are historically accurate	Meets Expectations Post(s) shows understanding of concept and insight into the material. Most opinions clearly reflect the perspective of the character and are historically accurate	Needs Improvement Post(s) shows evidence of misunderstanding the information; insight may not be well connected to the concept. Slips into and out of time period, may not accurately portray the perspective of the character	Below Expectations Post(s) shows little or no understanding of the concept, or suggests that the reading was not completed. No accurate understanding of the context or issues of the time.
Critical Thinking	Exceeds Expectations Post(s) shows deep analysis; new questions/ideas are mentioned that promote additional discussion; personal opinions are clearly expressed with supporting examples.	Meets Expectations Post(s) shows some analysis; one new idea/ question is mentioned; personal opinion is expressed.	Needs Improvement Post(s) shows limited analysis or analysis is poorly connected to concept. Only one idea or personal opinion expressed.	Below Expectations Post(s) shows little or no analysis; lack of connection between analysis and concept. May lack any new ideas or personal opinions.
Focus Group Discussion 30 %
	Exceeds Expectations 10 pts	Meets Expectations 8 pts	Needs Improvement 7 pts	Below Expectations 6 pts
College-level writing	Exceeds Expectations Language is clear, to the point, and easy to understand. Terms are used appropriately and content is logically organized. NEVER resembles a text message.	Meets Expectations Language is understandable, but has 1-2 sentences that are difficult to follow. Use of terms and organization are satisfactory. No text messaging spellings.	Needs Improvement Language is adequate, but 1 or 2 terms may be used incorrectly; may need to be re-read to understand. Some issues with organization of ideas. May include text messaging spellings.	Below Expectations Poorly written; terms used incorrectly; writer's meaning is unclear. May resemble a text message.
Replies	Exceeds Expectations Reply clearly relates to and builds on other student's post; continues discussion beyond one reply. Replies to required number of other students.	Meets Expectations Reply relates to and builds on other student's post. Replies to required number of other students.	Needs Improvement Reply relates somewhat to other student's post, but does not build on it. May not reply to required number of other students.	Below Expectations Reply responds to other student's post but does not meaningfully relate or build on it. May not reply to required number of other students.
Timeliness	Exceeds Expectations Posts early and often	Meets Expectations Replies on first day that replies are published.	Needs Improvement Replies on last day that replies are accepted.	Below Expectations Replies at end of last response day.
Summary 30 %
	Exceeds Expectations 10 pts	Meets Expectations 8 pts	Needs Improvement 7 pts	Below Expectations 6 pts
Evidence	Exceeds Expectations Answers all parts of the question in a sophisticated manner Evaluates or analyzes topic with sophistication	Meets Expectations May be unbalanced in answering the question or answers fully only one part of the question Is more descriptive and less analytical some attempt to evaluate or assess	Needs Improvement Only addresses part of the question or does so in a superficial manner Analysis is limited or ineffective Factual support is limited, no attempt made to link to thesis	Below Expectations General or vague discussion of something historical
Accuracy	Exceeds Expectations May contain minor errors	Meets Expectations May have errors that do not seriously detract from the quality of the essay	Needs Improvement Contains major errors	Below Expectations Does not answer the question posed
Organization/Mechanics	Exceeds Expectations Is clearly organized and well-written	Meets Expectations Shows acceptable organization and writing; language errors do not interfere with comprehension of the essay	Needs Improvement May be poorly organized and/or poorly written	Below Expectations Severe language or proofreading errors limit readiblity

Keywords:

discussion board, undergraduate, history

Subjects:

Types:

(Other)

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More History rubrics

More (Other) rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.

n98