iRubric: 1980s Interview Project rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

1980s Interview Project

Film-A-Friend Project

The students will film an interview with questions from the 1980's Scavenger Hunt

Rubric Code: S573AW

By babylon22

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: History

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 9-12

1980s
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts
Camera skills	Poor Shots out of focus White Balance missing. Poorly framed composition. Shaky camera takes away from project's effectiveness. Background takes away from the effectiveness of the interview.	Fair Uses a variety of shots Shots in focus most if not all of the time. Most shots framed properly. White Balanced. Background doesn't add or detract from the effectiveness of the interview.	Good Uses a variety of shots that advance the story. All shots in focus and properly(creatively) composed. White balanced. Background adds to the effectiveness of the interview.
Audio/Music	Poor Dialogue is muddy and difficult to understand. Overall audio sounds are not clear. Background is noisy.	Fair Dialogue is mostly clear and clean with some issues present. Overall mix is better but still needs tweaked.	Good Dialogue is clear and clean throughout. All levels mix well together and help advance the story. No unneccessary background noice.
Editing Skills	Poor Poor timing and edit points demonstrated throughout. No titles, effects used. Edit choices do not follow the topic chosen.	Fair Some trouble with timing and/or edit points. Some titles and effects used but do not effectively add to story. Edit choices at times do not follow the POV chosen.	Good Strong editing skills demonstrated, including proper timing, edit points, etc. Titles used and appropriate. Effects used and appropriate. All edit choices follow the topic chosen.
Lighting	Poor No lighting skills demonstrated. Lighting distracts from the interview's message.	Fair Some lighting skills demonstrated. Lighting used at times distracts from the message/interview.	Good Strong lighting skills demonstrated. Lighting used advances the interview's impact.
Questions/Topic	Poor Questions were not submitted prior to filming, and/or no evidence of preparation. Weak interview choice.	Fair Could not tell if questions were submitted prior to interview. Some topic sense was established. Somewhat weak interview choice.	Good Questions were submitted prior to interview. Good establishment of topic sense. Good interview choice.