iRubric: ED 663 Intro to Cognitive Disabilities Case Study rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

ED 663 Intro to Cognitive Disabilities Case Study

The student is put in the role of a parent of a child with a significant cognitive disability. As the child goes through chronological stages, the student needs to identify the types of needs and necessary resources for that child.

Rubric Code: S35X26

By DrDhafner

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Education

Type: Presentation

Grade Levels: Graduate

Intro to CD Case Study-Birth to 3
	Poor 5 pts	Good 10 pts	Excellent 15 pts	Score (N/A)
Etiology	Poor Improper use or lack of People -First language Weak evidence of knowledge in describing the how this particular etiology occurs Unfocused Presentation Little or no use of references, citations & resources	Good Occasional use of People-First Language Some evidence of knowledge in describing how the particulat etiology occurs. Presentation needs to be more focused. Some resources listed, but no evidence of relevance	Excellent Provides a thorough explanation(with examples) of the childs' challenges with an exact description of what the child is doing. Includes a well thought out question that exhibits knowledge of child development and evidence of the impact of etiology on the child Provides all relevant resources	Score
Medical Care	Poor Weak evidence of knowledge in describing childs' medical care Little or no evidence of analysis	Good Some evidence of knowledge in describing childs' medical care Some evidence of analysis, but omitted significant features	Excellent Includes evidence of thoughtful knowledge in describing the medical condition and provides an analysis based on professional sources (including citations)	Score
Family Family-Centered Intervention	Poor Weak evidence of knowledge in describing components of family-centered intervention. Little evidence of analysis on the impact on the family	Good Some evidence of knowledge in describing components of family-centered intervention. Some evidence of analysis on the impact on the family	Excellent Strong evidence of knowledge in describing components of family-centered intervention. Well-balanced evidence of analysis on the impact on the family	Score
Early Childhood Education	Poor Weak evidence of knowledge in describing components of the impact of early-childhood intervention on disability.	Good Some evidence of knowledge in describing components of the impact of early-childhood intervention on disability.	Excellent Strong evidence of knowledge in describing components of the impact of early-childhood intervention on disability.	Score
Developmental Models	Poor Weak evidence of knowledge in incorporating the use of developmental models in intervention. No description of developmental milestones	Good Some evidence of knowledge in incorporating the use of developmental models in intervention. Brief description of the child's progression through developmental milestones	Excellent Strong evidence of knowledge in incorporating the use of developmental models in intervention. Strong description of the child's progression through developmental milestones	Score
Ages 4-10 yrs
	Poor 5 pts	Good 10 pts	Excellent 15 pts	Score (N/A)
Inclusive Education	Poor Weak evidence of knowledge in describing how to implement inclusion in elementary education.	Good Some evidence of knowledge in describing how to implement inclusion in elementary education.	Excellent Strong evidence of knowledge in describing how to implement inclusion in elementary education.	Score
IEP	Poor Weak evidence in the understanding of the IEP process in determining eligibility and the role of the parents. No evidence of citations	Good Some evidence in the understanding of the IEP process in determining eligibility and the role of the parents. Some evidence of citations	Excellent Strong evidence in the understanding of how an IEP works, eligibility and the important role of the parents on the team. Evidence of citations	Score
Language Development	Poor Weak evidence in the understanding of how language development relates to their childs' disability.	Good Some evidence in the understanding of how language development relates to their childs' disability.	Excellent Strong evidence in the understanding of how language development relates to their childs' disability.	Score
Circle of Friends	Poor Weak evidence in the understanding of the importance of developing positive relationships with classroom peers.	Good Some evidence in the understanding of the importance of developing positive relationships with classroom peers.	Excellent Strong evidence in the understanding of the importance of developing positive relationships with classroom peers.	Score
Siblings	Poor Weak evidence in the understanding of the importance of developing positive, life-long relationships with sisters and brothers.	Good Some evidence in the understanding of the importance of developing positive, life-long relationships with sisters and brothers.	Excellent Strong evidence in the understanding of the importance of developing positive, life-long relationships with sisters and brothers.	Score
Advocacy	Poor Weak evidence in the understanding of the parental role in advocating for their child.	Good Some evidence in the understanding of the parental role in advocating for their child.	Excellent Strong evidence in the understanding of the partental role in advocating for their child.	Score
Grades 4th-8th
	Poor 5 pts	Good 10 pts	Excellent 15 pts	Score (N/A)
Autonomy	Poor Weak evidence in demonstrating the typical development of children at this age and how to encourage the child with a disability to gain independence.	Good Some evidence in the demonstrating the typical development of children at this age and how to encourage the child with a disability to gain independence.	Excellent Strong evidence in demonstrating the typical development of children at this age beginning to assert their own autonomy and how the child with a disability should be encouraged to gain independence.	Score
Social Networks	Poor Weak evidence in facilitating social networking for their child with peers of their own age, who have similar interests.	Good Some evidence in facilitating social networking for their child with peers of their own age, who have similar interests.	Excellent Strong evidence in facilitating social networking for their child with peers of their own age, who have similar interests.	Score
Behaviors	Poor Weak evidence in implementing positive behavioral supports across environments.	Good Some evidence in implementing positive behavioral supports across environments.	Excellent Strong evidence in implementing positive behavioral supports across environments.	Score
Social Development	Poor Weak evidence in understanding the emotional development of identity at this particular age.	Good Some evidence in understanding the emotional development of identity at this particular age.	Excellent Strong evidence in understanding the emotional development of identity at this particular age.	Score
Academic Inclusion	Poor Weak evidence of knowledge in describing how to implement inclusion in regular education in the middle schools- 4th-8th grades.	Good Some evidence of knowledge in describing how to implement inclusion in regular education in the middle schools- 4th-8th grades.	Excellent Strong evidence of knowledge in describing how to implement inclusion in regular education in the middle schools- 4th-8th grades.	Score
IEP Planning Team	Poor Weak evidence in showing the important role of the parents as advocates on the IEP team and the need for coordination of services across disciplines and environments. No evidence of citations	Good Some evidence in showing the important role of the parents as advocates on the IEP team and the need for coordination of services across disciplines and environments. Some evidence of citations	Excellent Strong evidence of the importance of the role parents as an advocate on the IEP team and the need for coordination of services across disciplines and environments. Evidence of citations	Score
Road Block	Poor Weak evidence in demonstrating that aside from the disability, their are unanticipated barriers that occur that requires parents to realign their priorities.	Good Some evidence in demonstrating that aside from the disability, their are unanticipated barriers that occur that requires parents to realign their priorities.	Excellent Strong evidence in demonstrating that aside from the disability, their are unanticipated barriers that requires parents to realign their priorities.	Score
HS & Transition
	Poor 5 pts	Good 10 pts	Excellent 15 pts	Score (N/A)
Transition Plans	Poor Weak evidence in understanding the critical components of transition planning prior to exiting high school. No evidence of citations	Good Some evidence in understanding the critical components of transition planning prior to exiting high school. Some evidence of citations	Excellent Strong evidence in understanding the critical components of transition planning prior to exiting high school. Strong evidence of citations	Score
Job Tr & Paid Employment	Poor Weak evidence differentiating the legal mandates in IDEA and post high school opportunities. Weak evidence in promoting "Employment First", community-based employment	Good Some evidence in differentiating the legal mandates in IDEA and post high school opportunities. Some evidence in promoting "Employment First", community-based employment	Excellent Strong evidence of understanding of how to conduct ecological inventories, functional assessments, identifying good job matchs, job training, and career planning. Strong evidence in promoting "Employment First", community-based employment	Score
Community Skills	Poor Weak evidence in identifying the types of functional skills students need upon exiting the school system	Good Some evidence in building functional skills in the community, including: communication, mobility, and safety as components of transition planning.	Excellent Strong evidence in building functional skills in the community, including communication, mobility and safety as components of transition planning	Score
Relationships	Poor Weak evidence in addressing the types of peer relationships that are important for personal growth, addressing dating, and intimacy.	Good Some evidence in addressing the types of peer relationships that are important for personal growth, and addressing dating, and intimacy	Excellent Strong evidence in addressing the types of peer relationships that are important for personal growth, addressing dating and intimacy	Score
Young Adults
	Poor 5 pts	Good 10 pts	Excellent 15 pts	Score (N/A)
Long-Term Supports	Poor Weak evidence in identifying the types of long-term supports the individual will need as a young adult.	Good Some evidence in indentfying the types of long-term supports the individuals will need as a young adult	Excellent Strong evidence in identifying long-term support needs over the span of the adult's life. The ability to see the person as an adult with adult issues.	Score
Least Restrictive Environment (LRE)	Poor Weak evidence in understanding the legal rights for individuals with disabilities and the need for placement in the least restrictive environment. No evidence of citations.	Good Some evidence in understanding the legal rights for individuals with disabilities and the need for placement in the least restrictive environment. Some evidence of citations	Excellent Strong evidence in understanding the legal rights for individuals with disabilities and the need for placement in the least restrictive environment. Strong evidence of citations	Score
Supportive Living	Poor Weak evidence in identifying the types of supported living arrangements available. Weak evidence in understanding the referral process and wait list for services	Good Some evidence in identifying the types of supported living arrangements available. Some evidence in understanding the referral process and wait list for services	Excellent Strong evidence in klnowing the providers of community-based residential services, the criteria for obtaining funding for these services.	Score
Natural Supports	Poor Weak evidence in identifying the types of supported living arrangements available. Weak evidence in understanding the referral process and the wait list for services.	Good Some evidence in displaying critical components for the development of long-term natural supports in the community.	Excellent Strong evidence in displaying critical components for the development of long-term natural supports in the community.	Score
Self-Determination	Poor Weak evidence in displaying a positive disposition towards self-determination.	Good Some evidence in displaying disposition towards self-directed services, and advocacy. Encouraging and supporting self-determination.	Excellent Strong evidence in displaying disposition towards self-directed services, and advocacy. Encouraging and supporting self-determination.	Score

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric