Skip to main content
iRubric: Literary Analysis Essay rubric

iRubric: Literary Analysis Essay rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Literary Analysis Essay 
Literary Analysis Essay
Rubric Code: S24XW95
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Survey  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Criteria for Essay
  Excellent

(N/A)

Satisfactory

(N/A)

Developing

(N/A)

Trying

(N/A)

Introduction/Thesis Statement

Excellent

Well-developed introduction with a clear thesis statement that introduces the topic and makes a central point about it. Logical progression through the paragraph and sound critical thinking.
Satisfactory

Introduction contains a thesis statement that is easy to understand.

The introduction creates interest, is accurate, and works with the thesis statement.
Developing

Introduction has a thesis, but maybe misleading or hard to understand.

Introduction is attempted, but does not work with the thesis statement or is too vague.
Trying

The introduction does not contain a thesis statement. It does not introduce the central theme of the essay.
Body Paragraphs

Excellent

Each body paragraph contains a clear topic sentence that focuses each paragraph around one point.

Text evidence is related to the topic sentence and used effectively.

Explanations in the body paragraphs are clear and well developed, and there are enough details to show a deep understanding of the literary work.
Satisfactory

Each body paragraph contains a clear topic sentence that focuses each paragraph on one point.

Text evidence is related to the topic sentence

Explanations are adequate but lack detailed explanation to show deep understanding of the literary work.
Developing

Body paragraphs are present and focus on one topic.

Text evidence is used, but it is not strong support for the topic.

Explanations are vague and do not develop the writer's ideas completely.
Trying

Body paragraphs are present and relate to the thesis.

Text evidence is ineffective.

Explanations are short and ineffective.
Conclusion

Excellent

Very well-developed conclusion wraps up the paper. The conclusion does not simply reiterate the introduction of the essay. The conclusion connects back to the larger topic at hand and leaves the reader with a lasting impression.
Satisfactory

Conclusion effectively wraps up the paper though may reiterate much of what was stated in the introduction of the paragraph. There is an attempt made to connect the essay to a larger theme or issue.
Developing

The conclusion does not effectively wrap up the essay. It is vague, or the introduction is merely restated.
Trying

The essay lacks a conclusion, or the conclusion is difficult to differentiate from body paragraphs.
Literary Analysis

Excellent

Analysis of the literature is complete and shows clear reasoning, has excellent support (text evidence and details), shows a deep understanding of the text and the claims of the thesis.
Satisfactory

Analysis of the literature is evident and shows good reasoning, has adequate support (text evidence and details), shows an understanding of the text and the claims of the thesis.
Developing

Analysis of the literature is attempted, has text support (text evidence and details), and attempts to understand the text and the thesis.
Trying

Analysis of the literature is not present and reads more like a summary of the text.
Overall Organization

Excellent

Logical progression of details with a clear and effective order

Transitions are used that enhance the essay and provides a vivid critical thinking.
Satisfactory

Logical progression of details with a clear and effective order.

Transitions are present, but they do not enhance the overall effectiveness of the paragraph.
Developing

Progression of details is difficult to understand.

Some transitions are present, while others are either inappropriate or missing.
Trying

Progression of details is missing.

Transitions are not present.
Style: Flow, tone, word choice

Excellent

Writing is smooth, skillful, and coherent.

Sentences are strong and expressive with varied structure.
Satisfactory

Writing is clear and coherent.

Sentences have varied structure.
Developing

Writing appears rushed or underdeveloped.

Multiple sentence fragments or run-on sentences are present.
Trying

Writing is confusing and hard to follow. Sentence structure is missing throughout the essay.
Mechanics of writing

Mechanics of writing :spelling, punctuation, grammar)

Excellent

No consistent errors in punctuation, spelling, grammar, or capitalization.
Satisfactory

A few minor consistent errors in punctuation, spelling, grammar, or capitalization, but they do not detract from the overall meaning and effectiveness of the paragraph.
Developing

Regular errors in punctuation, grammar, spelling, and capitalization that distract, but the meaning and intent of the paragraph can still be discerned.
Trying

The overall presentation of the essay displays a lack of proofreading and attention to detail.

While the essay MIGHT be readable, it is uncomfortable and unprofessional.



Keywords:
  • Literary analysis, Paragraph, rubric, writing components

Subjects:






Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98