iRubric: Feedback Well Executed Skill rubric

Student did not correctly label the skill. Student provided no definition of the skills, and student did not identify minute mark when skill was used.

Student was missing more than one of the following; correctly labeled the skill, correctly defined the skill, provided minute mark of when skill was used, and used appropriate citations.

Student is missing one of the following; correctly labeled the skill, correctly defined the skill, provided minute mark of when skill was used, and used appropriate citations.

Student accurately labeled and defined an easily identifiable skill with correct time mark and appropriate citations.

Student accurately labeled and defined a more uncommon skill with correct time mark citations beyond the required materials.

Student provided no feedback on how the skill connected to content before it was used.

Student makes no connections between the skill and what happened prior.

Student makes few connections between what happened prior and the skill use. Student misses crucial connections.

Student makes a solid and logical link between what happens before the skill and skill use. (If the skill is at the beginning of the session, the student notes how the skill connects to beginnings in general).

Student demonstrates insight between what happens before the skill use and the actual skill use. Integrates social work constructs to develop points with appropriate citations. (If the skill is at the beginning of the session, the student notes how the skill connects to beginnings in general).

Student provided no feedback on how the skill connected to the interview overall.

Students makes no connections and does not support their assessment.

Student makes few connections between the skill and the interview as a whole. Student provides no support for their assessment.

Student is able to make solid and logical connections between the skill and interview as a whole. Student supports their assessment.

Student is able to deconstruct the interview and create a logical link between the identified skill and the interview as a whole. The student utilizes appropriate citations to back up their assessment.

Student provided no feedback on the client's reaction for the skill.

Student incorrectly links client reactions, both verbal and nonverbal, to the skill and fails to make connections on the significance of these reactions.

Student links client reactions, both verbal and nonverbal, to the skill but fails to comment on their significance.

Student accurately links client reactions, both verbal and nonverbal, to the skill use. Student comments on the significance of these reactions.

Student is able to link client reactions, both verbal and nonverbal, to the skill and throughout the whole interview. Student comments on the significance of these reactions. Student supports their assessment with appropriate citations.

Student failed to complete the assignment.

Student writing was disorganized and unprofessional. Student did not use appropriate citations or citation method.

Student writing is professional but unorganized. The writing contains errors and some incorrect APA citations.

Student writing is well organized and professional with clear presentation of the material. The writing contains minimal errors and uses appropriate APA citation format.

Student writing is well organized and professional with clear presentation of the material. The writing contains no errors and has accurate APA citation formatting.