iRubric: Honors English 9 rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Honors English 9

English 9

To Kill a Mockingbird: Famous Court Cases This assignment is worth up to 70 points total.

Rubric Code: RX7WXB2

By jhawley

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: English

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 9-12

Inforgraphic/Presentation
	Poor 2 pts	Fair 5 pts	Good 8 pts	Outstanding 10 pts
Content	Poor Content does not meet minimum standards. No articles were used to gather information to put into info-graphic. Flow does not make sense	Fair Content does not meet minimum standards. Articles were used, but not from a reliable source. Flow makes minimal sense in that it doesn't provide detailed information	Good Content meets minimum standards for the assignment. Articles provides good, but sometimes vague information. The flow makes sense	Outstanding Content clearly covers topic and adds in another level to the assignment. Articles are from reliable sources and the flow increases understanding of the material.
Spelling Mechanics	Poor There are multiple spelling and grammar errors (5 or more)	Fair There are a few grammar and spelling errors (3-4)	Good There are minimal spelling and grammar errors (1-2)	Outstanding There are no spelling or grammar errors
MLA formatting	Poor MLA formatting is incorrect or does not exist. Borderline plagiarism.	Fair MLA formatting is incorrect with 3-4 errors	Good MLA formatting is somewhat correct with 1-2 errors	Outstanding MLA formatting is correct with no errors
Presentation	Poor Students were unsure of who stated what for presentation. It was not rehearsed and lacked flow. Very poor eye contact, inaudible voice.	Fair Students were unsure of who stated what for presentation. Students were fluent when speaking to the class. Poor eye contact and quiet voice.	Good Students were given parts to present. While presenting, they had good eye contact and voice, but often read from the board.	Outstanding Students were given parts to present. While presenting, they had excellent eye contact and voice. They did not read from the board.
Comparison	Poor Students did not compare and contrast the Tom Robinson Trial with the trial of choice. They simply focused on the trial they researched in class.	Fair Students are lacking quality comparison between trial of choice and Tom Robinson's case. The information is unorganized and lacking specific details to make it easy for the reader to identify	Good Students compare and contrast the famous trial of choice with Tom Robinson's case and provide an explanation of both. However, students lack in-depth thinking with comparisons and it is difficult to identify the similarities and differences between the two.	Outstanding Students compare and contrast the famous trial of choice with Tom Robinson's case and provide a detailed explanation of both. The reader can clearly identify the similarities and differences between the two.
Time	Poor Students submitted more than 3 days late	Fair Students submitted 2 days late	Good Students submitted 1 day late	Outstanding Students submitted on time.
Class Time	Poor Students did not use class time to work.	Fair Students worked 1 out of 3 days given in class.	Good Students worked 2 out of the 3 days given in class.	Outstanding Students worked in class all days and asked questions. If finished early, they checked in with the teacher for ways to improve presentation.

Subjects:

English

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric