iRubric: Probability (Family Fued) Scoring Rubric Grade 9

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Probability (Family Fued) Scoring Rubric Grade 9

This rubric will be used to score student book projects based on their independent reading. The student grade will be a combination of their project and their knowledge of the book's narrative elements (setting, characters, plot) shared during the presentation to the class. Notecards can be made to help guide the students during their presentation.

Rubric Code: R94XWW

By McIntyre

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Math

Type: Project

Grade Levels: K-5

Probability (Family Fued)Rubric
	Excellent 4 pts	Good 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Poor 1 pts
Question Choices	Excellent All questions are unique and free of "potential problems" stated on page 432 of text.	Good Most questions are unique and had no more than two "potential problems" stated on page 432 of text.	Fair Some questions are unique and had no more than four "potential problems" stated on page 432 of text.	Poor Questions are repetitive and had no more than six "potential problems" stated on page 432 of text.
Collection of Data	Excellent Four out of the six sampling methods found on page 446 of the text were used for data collection.	Good Three out of the six sampling methods found on page 446 of the text were used for data collection.	Fair Two out of the six sampling methods found on page 446 of the text were used for data collection.	Poor One out of the six sampling methods found on page 446 of the text were used for data collection.
Organization of Data	Excellent The data is readable, clean, neat and attractive. It is free of erasures and crossed-out words. It looks like the group took great pride in it.	Good The data is readable, neat and attractive. It may have one or two erasures, but they are not distracting. It looks like the group took some pride in it.	Fair The data is readable and some of the pages are attractive. It looks like parts of it might have been done in a hurry.	Poor The data is not neat or attractive. It looks like the group just wanted to get it done and didn't care what it looked like.
Group Dynamics	Excellent Everyone was true to their "duties". Group members were considerate of each other.	Good The group usually listens to, shares with, and supports the efforts of each other. Focuses on the task and what needs to be done most of the time.	Fair The group often listens to, shares with and supports each other but sometimes do not get along. Focuses on the task and what needs to be done some of the time. Members of the group must sometimes nag prod and remind each other to keep on task.	Poor Group moral was low and members were off task most of the time.