iRubric: Canterbury Tales: Dinner Party Project Rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Canterbury Tales: Dinner Party Project Rubric

Student Task: You are the host of the Drabat Inn and the weary pilgrims of The Canterbury Tales have arrived for a short rest. It is your task to seat them at the dinner table for twelve people. You must set it up according to whom will get along best, or, if you are a troublemaker, set it up according to whom will get along worst!

Rubric Code: R94535

By mnoyes

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: English

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 9-12

Enter rubric title
	Excellent 4 pts	Good 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Poor 1 pts
Logistics	Excellent Project demonstrates excellent logical evidence of seating chart placement.	Good Project demonstrates clear evidence of adequate logic of seating chart placement.	Fair Project demonstrates an attempt at incorporating logical evidence.	Poor Project demonstrates little or no evidence of logic.
Appearance	Excellent Seating chart is attractive and creative.	Good Seating chart is well-done	Fair Seating chart is passable--it gets the job done.	Poor Seating chart is either not provided or done with only superficially.
Conversation	Excellent Knowledge of the characters is excellently demonstrated in their conversation. Specific references to the original text are present.	Good Knowledge of the characters is demonstrated in their conversation. References to the original text are present.	Fair Knowledge of the characters is demonstrated in their conversation. There are no specific references to the original text present.	Poor Knowledge of the characters is not demonstrated in their conversation. There are no specific references to the original text present.
Rationale	Excellent Excellent understanding of the reasons for the seating arrangement has been demonstrated.	Good Clear understanding of the reasons for the seating arrangement has been demonstrated.	Fair Some understanding of the reasons has been demonstrated.	Poor No understanding of the reasons is evident.
Mechanics/Conventions	Excellent Makes no errors in final draft, conversation, or seating chart	Good Makes 1-5 errors on project	Fair Makes 6-10 errors	Poor Makes more than 11 errors
	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor