Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Advocacy Campaign 2020: Short Film rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
(draft)
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Advocacy Campaign 2020: Short Film
Culminating Performance Output for Philosophy and Contemporary Philippine Arts from the Region: The students will create a short film highlighting the various philosophical themes discussed within the local landscape.
Rubric Code:
R2XX5BA
By
RUBENJOHN
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject:
Philosophy
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Advocacy Campaign 2020: Short Film
Did Not Meet Outcomes
(N/A)
Working Toward Outcomes
(N/A)
Meeting Outcomes
(N/A)
Exceeding Outcomes
(N/A)
Comments
(N/A)
SCRIPT 12%
Did Not Meet Outcomes
Did not turn in script at all or what was turned in barely qualifies as a script.
(5 points)
Working Toward Outcomes
Partial script or not even close to meeting deadline. Rarely follows proper format as provided in examples. Missing significant amount of dialogue, stage directions, scene/set descriptions, and/or technical notes. Not enough dialogue and action are include to meet the time requirement of 5-10 minutes in length.
(8 points)
Meeting Outcomes
Complete script for entire film turned in close to deadline. Mostly uses proper format as provided in samples. Includes most dialogue, stage directions, scene/set descriptions, and technical notes. The amount of dialogue and action are close to filling the time requirement of 5-10 minutes in length.
(10 points)
Exceeding Outcomes
Complete script for entire film turned in by deadline. Uses proper format as provided in samples. Includes all dialogue, stage directions, scene/set descriptions, and technical notes. Enough dialogue and action are included to meet the time requirement of 5-10 minutes in length.
(12 points)
Comments
EVIDENCE OF INFLUENCE 12%
Did Not Meet Outcomes
No clear influence of selected genre is seen.
(5 points)
Working Toward Outcomes
Flashes of influence are seen, but those seem accidental rather than deliberate.
(8 points)
Meeting Outcomes
Some evidence of influence of selected genre. Themes, plot, character development, audio use, shot composition, or editing techniques occasionally reflect those of said genre.
(10 points)
Exceeding Outcomes
Clear evidence of influence of selected genre. Themes, plot, character development, audio use, shot composition, or editing techniques reflect those of said genre.
(12 points)
Comments
PLOT/DRAMATIC STRUCTURE 14%
Did Not Meet Outcomes
What plot? This is a collection of random actions with nothing tying them together. Everyone who appears on screen is immediately forgettable. No real character development to speak of.
(6 points)
Working Toward Outcomes
Plot is difficult to follow, and lacks either a clear beginning, middle, or end. Dramatic structure is only somewhat followed, and actions seem random. Some characters are developed, but at least half are just people on the screen. Whose story is this? (9 points)
Meeting Outcomes
Plot has mostly clear beginning, middle, and end. Dramatic structure is generally followed, but wanders in places. Climax of story is clear. Most characters are as thoroughly fleshed-out as the story requires. Main characters are clear, but their roles in the story may not be.
(12 points)
Exceeding Outcomes
Plot has clear beginning, middle, and end. Dramatic structure builds to climax, then ends with falling action. All characters are as thoroughly fleshed-out as the story requires. Clear protagonist and antagonist.
(14 points)
Comments
CREATIVITY 12%
Did Not Meet Outcomes
The story is told in straightforward manner. The limited resources are used in a limited manner.
(5 points)
Working Toward Outcomes
The story is told with moments of innovation. Some moments of innovation in the use of available resources.
(8 points)
Meeting Outcomes
The story is told in a different but not unfamiliar manner. The limited resources available are used in a somewhat inventive manner.
(10 points)
Exceeding Outcomes
The story is told in a new and innovative manner while the source material remains recognizable. The limited resources available are used in an inventive manner.
(12 points)
Comments
CINEMATOGRAPHY 10%
Did Not Meet Outcomes
Little, if any, attention paid to shot composition. Shots and angles are boring. Viewers don't want to continue watching this film.
(4 points)
Working Toward Outcomes
Some clever and creative shots and angles are used, but more attention was paid to WHAT was shot than HOW it was shot.
(7 points)
Meeting Outcomes
Shot composition is sometimes crafted to the mood and purpose of each scene. Clever and creative shots and angles are used for the majority of the film. Visually interesting and memorable for most of the film.
(9 points)
Exceeding Outcomes
Shot composition is carefully crafted to the mood and purpose of each scene. Clever and creative shots and angles are used throughout the film. Visually interesting and memorable.
(10 points)
Comments
AUDIO/LIGHTING 10%
Did Not Meet Outcomes
Dialogue is difficult to understand for the majority of the film. Little to no use of music or sound effects. Audio was not a priority in this film. Footage is too dark to be seen or overexposed for the majority of the film.
(4 points)
Working Toward Outcomes
Dialogue is overpowered by background noise or audio buzz. Music and sound effects are in the film because the team liked them, as opposed to helping tell the story. Not much attention was paid to lighting, but the viewer can still see most of the action.
(7 points)
Meeting Outcomes
The majority of dialogue sounds clear and crisp, with few audio problems. Music and sound effects suit the cinematography, character, and mood for the majority of the film. Lighting is frequently suitable to the mood of the scene, and the majority of it is technically well done.
(9 points)
Exceeding Outcomes
Dialogue sounds clear and crisp. Music and sound effects suit the cinematography, character, and mood. Lighting is always suitable to the mood of the scene, and technically well done.
(10 points)
Comments
TEAMWORK 10%
Did Not Meet Outcomes
This wasn't a group production so much as a solo project.
(4 points)
Working Toward Outcomes
Some members of the team contributed greatly to the creation of the film in order to make it happen. Work was distributed unevenly among team members, and/or lots of fighting occurred during production. Only some members of the team appeared in the film.
(7 points)
Meeting Outcomes
Most members of the team contributed equally to the creation of the film. Work was distributed among team members but some did more than others, and/or some bickering occurred during production. Not all members of the team appeared in the film.
(9 points)
Exceeding Outcomes
All members of the team contributed equally to the creation of the film. Work was distributed evenly among team members, little fighting occurred during production. All members of the team appeared in the film at some point.
(10 points)
Comments
COSTUME/PROPS 10%
Did Not Meet Outcomes
People showed up in clothes. That's it. Three or more "magical mystical costume changes" between scenes. Props are missing or poorly chosen.
(4 points)
Working Toward Outcomes
Little attention was paid to planning costumes and props, but the end result isn't too bad. Two "magical mystical costume changes" between scenes. Some props are inappropriate, or look too obviously fake.
(7 points)
Meeting Outcomes
Most costumes and props are suitable to character, time, and place. One "magical mystical costume change" between scenes. Most props look real.
(9 points)
Exceeding Outcomes
All costumes and props are suitable to character, time, and place. No "magical mystical costume changes" between scenes. All props look as real as possible.
(10 points)
Comments
Keywords:
Senior High School Department, Introduction to the Philosophy of the Human Person, Culminating Performance Output, Short Film, Advocacy Campaign
Subjects:
Philosophy
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Philosophy rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to
ready to use
.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.