iRubric: Politics of Black Foodways Final Paper/Presentation Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Politics of Black Foodways Final Paper/Presentation Rubric

Power and the Individual Paper/Presentation Rubric

Rubric Code: R234WX8

By chefjude

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Social Sciences

Type: Presentation

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

P&I Paper/Presentation Remember, this is your FINAL EXAM. In total, this project is worth 20% of your grade for this semester.
	Poor (F) 0 pts	Limited (D) 1 pts	Fair (C) 2 pts	Good (B) 3 pts	Excellent (A) 4 pts
Context, Pt. 1	Poor Does not Introduce the change maker to be discussed. Gives no, or entirely irrelevant, background on the speaker.	Limited the change maker to be discussed insufficiently. Gives irrelevant or insufficient background on the speaker.	Fair the change maker to be discussed vaguely. Gives some relevant background on the speaker.	Good Introduces the the change maker to be discussed. Gives mostly relevant and sufficient background on the speaker.	Excellent Introduces the change maker to be discussed and gives background on their work, with all relevant information and with nothing irrelevant.
Research and Context, Pt. 2	Poor Gives no relevant information necessary to fully comprehending the message of the work: not having considered or researched current events, history, communities, traditions, etc.	Limited Gives little relevant information necessary to fully comprehending the message of the work, having only vaguely considered and researched current events, history, communities, traditions, etc.	Fair Gives some relevant information necessary to fully comprehending the message of the work, having somewhat considered and researched current events, history, communities, traditions, etc.	Good Gives most of the relevant information necessary to fully comprehending the message of the work, having mostly considered and researched current events, history, communities, traditions, etc.	Excellent Gives all relevant information necessary to fully comprehending the message of the work, having considered and researched current events, history, communities, traditions, etc.
Comprehension & Analysis	Poor The connotative and/or denotative meanings of key issues are misunderstood and/or miscommunicated to the audience.	Limited The connotative and denotative meanings of key issues are shallowly understood and communicated to the audience, but with major lapses in comprehension or analysis of message.	Fair The connotative and denotative meanings of key issues are partially understood and communicated to the audience, with some lapses in comprehension or analysis of message.	Good The connotative and denotative meanings of key issues are understood and communicated to the audience, with some minor lapses in comprehension or analysis of message.	Excellent Both the connotative and denotative meanings of key issues are understood and successfully communicated to the audience.
Relationship to Theme	Poor Provided a vague interpretation of the work through the lens of the power and politics of Black foodways. Made no attempt to tie the work to academic scholarship and issues of the twenty-first century.	Limited Provided a vague interpretation of the work through the lens of the power and politics of Black foodways. Made little attempt to tie the work to academic scholarship and issues of the twenty-first century.	Fair Provided a somewhat convincing interpretation of the work through the lens of the power and politics of Black foodways. Partially succeeded in tying the leader's work to academic scholarship and issues of the twenty-first century.	Good Provided a mostly clear and convincing interpretation of the work through the lens of the power and politics of Black foodways. Mostly tied the leader's work to academic scholarship and issues of the twenty-first century.	Excellent Provided a clear and convincing interpretation of the work through the lens of the power and politics of Black foodways. Successfully tied the leader's work to academic scholarship and issues of the twenty-first century.
Bibliography & Material	Poor No sources are cited on a Works Cited page or slide in MLA format. Missing in-text citations within the essay or presentation. Did not provided audience with access to the work being discussed.	Limited No sources are cited on a Works Cited page or slide in MLA format. And/or missing in-text citations within the essay or presentation. May not have provided audience with access to the work being discussed.	Fair No sources are cited on a Works Cited page or slide in MLA format. And/or missing in-text citations within the essay or presentation. Provided audience with access to the work being discussed.	Good All sources used are cited on a Works Cited page or slide in MLA format with in-text citations within the essay or presentation. Provided audience with access to the work being discussed.	Excellent All sources used are cited on a Works Cited page or slide in MLA format with in-text citations within the essay or presentation. Provided audience with access to the work being discussed.
Presentation Standards	Poor Speaker is not well-practiced and has a shallow depth of knowledge, may be at times inaudible, may have little eye contact, and is overly reliant on notes or long pauses. The slides are overly simplistic or overly complex. The slides show effort to do the minimum.	Limited Speaker is somewhat practiced and has a shallow depth of knowledge, is mostly audible, makes some eye contact, reliant on notes or long pauses. The slides may be overly simplistic or overly complex. The slides show effort to do the minimum.	Fair Speaker is somewhat practiced and knowledgeable, is audible, often makes eye contact, but may be reliant on notes or long pauses. The slides may be overly simplistic or overly complex. The slides show effort to do the minimum.	Good Speaker is well practiced and knowledgeable, is audible, often makes eye contact, and is not overly reliant on notes or long pauses. The slides support the presenter, instead of the presenter supporting the slides. The slides show effort to do well, not to do the bare minimum.	Excellent Speaker is clearly practiced and knowledgeable, is audible, consistently makes eye contact, and is not reliant on notes or long pauses. The slides support the presenter, instead of the presenter supporting the slides. The slides show effort to do well, not to do the bare minimum.
Essay Standards	Poor The essay is often incoherent, incohesive, and poorly-structured. Style shows little attempt to display skill. Contains many errors in grammar, spelling, capitalization, and punctuation. Contains contractions or slang.	Limited The essay is only partially coherent, cohesive, and structured. Style shows little attempt to display skill. Contains several errors in grammar, spelling, capitalization, and punctuation. Contains contractions or slang.	Fair The essay is mostly coherent, cohesive, and well-structured. Style shows moderate skill. Contains some errors in grammar, spelling, capitalization, and punctuation. Contains no contractions or slang.	Good The essay is coherent, cohesive, and well-structured. Some skillful use of style. Contains a few errors in grammar, spelling, capitalization, and punctuation. Contains no contractions or slang.	Excellent The essay is coherent, cohesive, and well-structured. Skillful use of style. Contains very few errors in grammar, spelling, capitalization, and punctuation. Contains no contractions or slang.
Overall Quality/Effort	Poor The assignment was not taken seriously at all and was not important to the student. And/or the content and communication were not engaging. And/or student did not respect others.	Limited The assignment was not taken seriously and was not important to the student. Or the content and communication were not interesting/engaging. Or student did not respect others.	Fair The assignment was taken somewhat seriously and was somewhat important to the student. The content and communication were somewhat interesting/engaging. Student respected others.	Good The assignment was mostly taken seriously and was mostly important to the student. The content and telling of the research were mostly interesting/engaging. Student respected others.	Excellent Clearly shows that the assignment was taken seriously and was important to the student. The content of the research and the telling were quite interesting/ engaging. Student showed great respect for others.

Subjects:

Types:

Presentation

Discuss this rubric