Skip to main content
iRubric: Russia Investigation in RACE format rubric

iRubric: Russia Investigation in RACE format rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Russia Investigation in RACE format 
RACE - In Longer Response (Essay)
This rubric is used to assess answers that require a longer, multi-paragraph, essay answer, but which should still incorporate the elements of RACE.
Rubric Code: QXAW4W4
By kcholmes
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Geography  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: 6-8

Powered by iRubric Russia Investigation in RACE format
  Poor

0 pts

Fair

3 pts

Good

5 pts

RESTATE

In the introduction paragraph, the writer restates the question.
Poor

The question is not restated. Response begins with "Because," "So," or "That."
Fair

There is an attempt to restate, or the question is restated partially, but it is not clear.
Good

The question is clearly restated/reworded in the response. The reader knows what to expect.
ANSWER Part 1

In the introduction paragraph, the writer answers the question in his own words.
Poor

There is no answer or the answer has nothing to do with the question.
Fair

The answer is partly correct, incomplete, or student does not show a clear understanding of how to proceed.
Answer responds to questions not asked.
Good

The question is answered fully and correctly, showing that the writer knows what is being asked.
Answer Part 2

Following a simple answer, the writer outlines the key points that will be discussed in the essay.
Poor

Fewer than two key points are outlined. OR no outlined points will support the author's answer.
Fair

Two valid points, which support the writer's answer, are outlined. OR Not all three outlined points will support the answer.
Good

Three valid points, which support the writer's answer, are outlined.
CONVINCE & CITE 1

First paragraph after the introduction provides evidence and proves one of the writer's key points.
Poor

There are no examples provided.
Fair

One example is provided OR examples are present, but do not support the answer.

The writer does not tell where (page, paragraph, etc.) evidence was found.
Good

Two or more examples are provided, they are relevant to the question and they fully support the answer.

The writer tells where (page, paragraph, etc.) evidence was found.
CONVINCE & CITE 2

Second paragraph after the introduction provides evidence and proves one of the writer's key points.
Poor

There are no examples provided.
Fair

One example is provided OR examples are present, but do not support the answer.

The writer does not tell where (page, paragraph, etc.) evidence was found.
Good

Two or more examples are provided, they are relevant to the question and they fully support the answer.

The writer tells where (page, paragraph, etc.) evidence was found.
CONVINCE & CITE 3

Third paragraph after the introduction provides evidence and proves one of the writer's key points.
Poor

There are no examples provided.
Fair

One example is provided OR examples are present, but do not support the answer.

The writer does not tell where (page, paragraph, etc.) evidence was found.
Good

Two or more examples are provided, they are relevant to the question and they fully support the answer.

The writer tells where (page, paragraph, etc.) evidence was found.
EXPLAIN & EXTEND

Concluding paragraph.
Poor

No adequate explanation or extension is provided.
Fair

The response attempts to supply reasoning and/or inferencing which supports the answer, but falls short. A connection is made.

OR
The response supplies reasoning and/or inferencing, but does not connect to real life.
Good

The response supplies reasoning and/or inferencing which strongly supports the answer. Writer is able to make a relevant connection to real life.
EDITING

Poor

There is no evidence that the response has been re-read, revised, edited and there are several errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, capitalization, and sentence structure.
Fair

There is some evidence that the response has been re-read, revised, and edited and no more than 3 errors exist in spelling,grammar, punctuation, capitalization, and sentence structure.
Good

There is clear evidence that the response has been re-read, revised, and edited and only 1-2 errors exist in spelling, grammar, punctuation, capitalization, and sentence structure. Linking verbs are kept to a minimum with no more than 5 in the essay.





Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16