Skip to main content

iRubric: Natural Disaster Rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Natural Disaster Rubric 
Presentation Evaluation
Rubric Code: QB5W52
By soozie2804
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Science  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: K-5

Powered by iRubric Presentation Evaluation
Enter rubric description
  Needs Improvement

1 point each

4-6 pts

(N/A)

Fair

2 points each

7-11 pts

(N/A)

Good

3 points each

12-14 pts

(N/A)

Excellent

4 points each

15-16 pts

(N/A)

Use of Language
pts

Needs Improvement

Student is barely audible, speech rate is very slow, pronunciation is poor, speaks in incomplete sentences, and speech is unclear.
Fair

Some students were inaudible, while others were audible. Speech rate was fair, pronunciation was fair, spoke in some complete sentences, and could speak more clearly about the topic.
Good

Student is articulate, and at a proper volume , maintains a steady speech rate, pronunciation is good, speaks in complete sentences, and speaks clearly about the topic
Excellent

Student is poised, articulate, and a at proper volume, maintains a steady speech rate, pronunciation is precise, speaks in complete sentences, and speaks clearly and enthusiatically about the topic
Required Elements
pts

Needs Improvement

The poster is missing several key required elements. The students did not address the requirements of their jobs.
Fair

The poster is missing several required elements. One or more students did not address the research questions requirements of their jobs.
Good

The poster included all the required elements. All students answered the research questions that were required by their jobs
Excellent

The poster included all the required elements, and more. All students answered the research questions that were required by their jobs.
Illustrations
1 pts

Needs Improvement

The poster was poorly designed and the graphics were not related to the project at hand.
Fair

The design of the poster was fair, and additional graphics would have added to the relevance of the poster.
Good

The graphics and design were attractive, relevant, and added to the relevance of the natural disaster poster.
Excellent

The graphics and design were very attractive, relevant, and added to the relevance of the natural disaster poster.
Mechanics
1 pts

Needs Improvement

There were numerous errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, and captalization.
Fair

There were several errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, and capitalization
Good

There were one or two errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, and capitalization
Excellent

There were no errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, and capitalization.






Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n224