- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Boys Varsity Basketball Head Coach Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Boys Varsity Basketball Head Coach Rubric Boys Varsity Basketball Head Coach Rubric Interview rubric for Boys Basketball Head Coach Interview Rubric Code: Q24X82A By jilliantheus Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: (General) Type: Assessment Grade Levels: 9-12

Varsity Head Basketball Coach Interview Rubric
	Questions N/A (N/A)	Poor Demonstrates little knowledge or evidence 1 pts	Fair Demonstrate average knowledge or evidence 2 pts	Good Demonstrates a higher than average amount of evidence 3 pts	Excellent Demonstrates a superior answer or an outstanding amount of evidence 4 pts
Professional Preparation 4 pts	Questions What do you know about our LPHS boys basketball program?	Poor Candidate exhibits very little knowledge about LPHS program	Fair Candidate exhibits some knowledge about LPHS program	Good Candidate exhibits knowledge about LPHS program	Excellent Candidate exhibits vested interest in LPHS program and gives well thought out reasons on how they can leave an impact on the program.
Program Vision 4 pts	Questions Describe three short term goals for the program if you were selected the head coach. Looking ahead, describe three long term goals for the program.	Poor Candidate demonstrated no long-term plans or goals for program. Candidate does have goals but not clear evidence of how he/she will move to accomplish.	Fair Candidate has some ideas of future for program, but did not specifically express what the goals are with ways to implement.	Good Candidate has direction of goals for program and a plan to achieve desired goals.	Excellent Candidate has detailed plans for goals and vision of program and provides explanation with evidence how they will be accomplished.
Adaptability 4 pts	Questions Describe when you have had to overcome a challenge at work to ensure program success.	Poor Candidate gave no indication of adaptability in overcoming a challenge. Blamed others for challenges faced.	Fair Candidate gave weak example of overcoming a challenge and showed little adaptability.	Good Candidate gave example of a challenge faced and showed good plan for dealing with the challenge.	Excellent Candidate gave example and showed good technique and planning to overcome that challenge and ensure success. Did not see challenge as roadblock.
Conflict management 4 pts	Questions How would you handle the following? You have a senior athlete who is dedicated to the program and is passed over in off season workouts by an underclassman. The senior's parents come in to question you. Describe how you would handle the conversation.	Poor Candidate exhibits very little idea how to properly deal with the situation.	Fair Candidate exhibits some idea how to properly deal with the situation.	Good Candidate indicates ways to properly de-escalate situation and deal with the conflict.	Excellent Candidate shows a vast array of techniques to de-escalate the situation, restore parental trust and player comraderie.
Team Communication 4 pts	Questions After a tough game that resulted in a tough loss, as a result of staff error or player error, describe how you would handle the media and handle the dejected team in the locker room?	Poor Candidate does not cite examples of how to handle to communicate effectively after a an undesired outcome.	Fair candidate understand the importance of how to deal with this situation after a tough game and cites examples of how to do so.	Good Candidate cites a variety of ideas of how to deal with the media and his players after a tough loss which fosters team unity and growth.	Excellent Candidate is able to reflect on what would be needed to help team grown and learn from the tough loss as well as recognizing the importance of handling the media in a way that doesn't reflect poorly on him or his team.
Conflict Management 4 pts	Questions Sometimes undesirable behaviors become a part of the culture of basketball and become acceptable. Describe how you would handle some of these issues around your program such as foul language, skipping class, and failing grades?	Poor Candidate exhibits very little idea how to properly deal with the situation.	Fair Candidate exhibits some idea how to properly deal with the situation.	Good Candidate indicates ways to properly de-escalate situation and deal with the conflict.	Excellent Candidate shows a vast array of techniques to implement a high degree of ethics that lead to academic and community leadership.
Transition, Philosophy, Conflict 4 pts	Questions Describe how you will handle transition in a short time period, how will you handle athletes who question you and feel that the previous coaching style is better than yours. How would you deal with disrespect to assistant?	Poor Candidate does not demonstrate organized, detailed thoughts in the area of how they will move ahead with their ideas	Fair candidate demonstrates some evidence of having a plan in this area.	Good Candidate demonstrates the ability to talk in detail of their plan as well as provide some examples.	Excellent Candidate has clear conscise plan with evidence of how it will be accomplished.
Linking Academics and Athletics 4 pts practice philosophy	Questions Describe your relationship with the academic staff at your current school and discuss your plans to link academics with athletics. How will you get the faculty to take a vested interest in your athletic program?	Poor Candidate has little experience and does not have knowledge of ways to link athletes and academics or promote the program with faculty.	Fair Candidate cites examples that are proactive and methods which will help students stay eligible. Few ideas as to how to get promote program with faculty.	Good Candidate shows that he/she would place their eligibility and role of a student ahead of their role as a basketball player. Had some good ideas as to how to get promote program with faculty.	Excellent Candidate cites examples of how he/she will work in a hands on manner to make sure that the student achieves their academic potential while a member of their program. Genuinely wants to incorporate faculty into program, with well thought plans of how to do so.
Structure/Discipline 4 pts	Questions What do you view as the most important elements to build structure and discipline in your program? What will you do when a highly respected player on the team doesn't meet those expectations?	Poor Candidate doesn't have a clear idea of how to deal with this issue.	Fair Candidate has an idea of what is expected but does not have clear expectations of how to accomplish	Good Candidate has expectation and and clear expectations with methods to accomplish these goals and expectations.	Excellent candidate has a through understanding of what is needed to build structure and discipline. Candidate has examples of how this will be implemented and accomplished in their program.
Coaching Expectations 4 pts	Questions What are your expectations for your assistant coaches and what can your assistant coaches expect from you?	Poor Candidate has some knowledge of roles among the staff.	Fair candidate has detailed knowledge about what is expected from the staff and also from them as the leader of the staff	Good candidate has clear expectations with well defined roles for each of the coaches	Excellent candidate has outlined roles with expectations and gives examples fo what each coach is expected to do to be successful on the staff
Coaching Expectations 4 pts	Questions Who do you plan to have on your staff, and what roles will they have? How will they be organized across the various levels of the program?	Poor Candidate has some knowledge of roles among the staff.	Fair Candidate has detailed knowledge about what is expected from the staff and also from them as the leader of the staff.	Good Candidate has clear expectations with well defined roles for each of the coaches.	Excellent Candidate has outlined roles with expectations and gives examples fo what each coach is expected to do to be successful on the staff.
Personal Qualities 4 pts	Questions Tell us your strengths and weaknesses that you will bring to the program.	Poor Candidate is not reflective in nature and is only able to cite strengths they can offer the program	Fair Candidate is reflective in nature but isn't able to tell how these items will impact the program	Good Candidate is able to cite strengths and weaknesses and how they will impact the program but doesn not tell how they will work to address their weaknesses	Excellent Candidate is reflective and is able to cite examples of positive and negative items which they will use to foster and grow the program. They also address how they will handle their weaknesses.
Eligibility 4 pts	Questions What steps will you take to make sure students athletes are eligible?	Poor Candidate has little experience and does not have knowledge of ways to help athletes stay eligible	Fair candidate cites examples that are proactive and methods which will help students stay eligible.	Good candidate shows that they would place their eligibility and role of a student ahead of their role as a football player	Excellent Candidate cites examples of how they will work in a hands on manner to make sure that the student achieves their academic potential while a member of their program.
Program Vision/Leadership 4 pts	Questions What are the most important criteria that you look for in a member of the Lions program and why?	Poor Candidate is able to cite qualities but does not explain why.	Fair Candidate cites qualities with reasons why those are important.	Good Candidate cites qualities with reasons why they are important. They explain how these qualities will make their program successful.	Excellent Candidate cites qualities with reasons why they are important, describe how they will impact their program and how they are used to impact the community as well.
Program vision 4 pts	Questions What's more important to you as a coach, winning games or building a program?	Poor Candidate is able to cite which is most important and explains why.	Fair candidate cites qualities with reasons why those are important	Good candidate cites qualities with reasons why they are important. They explain how these qualities will make their program successful.	Excellent Candidate cites qualities with reasons why they are important, describe how they will impact their program and how they are used to impact the community as well.
Coaching Staff 1 pts	Questions If you are not selected as the head coach, if asked to be an assistant, would you be willing to be a part of the Lion's program?	Poor	Fair	Good	Excellent
School Community partnership 4 pts	Questions Do you feel what has been done in the past by the coaching staff, administration, booster club, and community as far as building a quality basketball program is sufficient? What changes will you implment and how will you get everyone to "buy into" your vision?	Poor Candidate has no experience with this and is unable to create a rapport with parents, staff, school, and community. Does not cite ways to get people to buy in.	Fair Candidate has experiences to cite and is able but not confident to create a rapport with parents, staff and community. has limited ideas how to get people to buy into vision.	Good Candidate has experience and is adequate in creating a rapport with parents, staff, school, and community. Is able to cite changes and hwo they will accomplish	Excellent Candidate has experience, demonstrated how to create a rapport with parents, staff, school and community, cites changes and ways to move to accomplish those ideas and given specific details how people will buy into vision
Program Leadership and Vision 4 pts	Questions We have had many candidates apply for this job. Why are you the right person to lead the LPHS basketball program?	Poor Candidate has no clear vision.	Fair Candidate has a vision, but gives little detail as to why he/she should be selected.	Good Candidate has clear vision for the program and gives reasons as to why he/she should be selected.	Excellent Candidate is motivated and has an exciting vision for program. He/she shares compelling reasons to select him/her.

Keywords:

Basketball Coach Interview

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric