iRubric: SCIENTIFIC NOTATION -LESSON PLAN PRACTICE rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

SCIENTIFIC NOTATION -LESSON PLAN PRACTICE

Process Standard: Aligns to TeKS Process Standards, Grades 6-8 8.2.C The student will convert between standard decimal notation and scientific notation; and Analyze negative exponents Evaluate negative exponents Convert between standard and scientific notation Compare numbers written in scientific notation Multiply numbers written in scientific notation Divide numbers written in scientific notation

Rubric Code: PXX396C

By LPARDUE79

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Math

Type: (Other)

Grade Levels: 6-8

SCIENTIFIC NOTATION LESSON PLAN Scientific Notation 8.2.c
	EXCELLENT All of the criteria w/additional information. 9 pts	PROPER All of the criteria 7 pts	SATISFACTORY Met most of the criteria. 5 pts	UNSATISFACTORY Met little of the criteria. 3 pts	POOR Did not meet criteria. 1 pts
Content Accuracy Statements contain pertinent information applicable to the use of scientific notation in a real-world setting.	EXCELLENT There are 5 or more facts that detail the accurate use of scientific notation in a real-world setting. This does NOT include conversion examples.	PROPER There are 4 facts that detail the accurate use of scientific notation in a real-world setting. This does NOT include conversion examples.	SATISFACTORY There are 3 facts that detail the accurate use of scientific notation in a real-world setting. This does NOT include conversion examples.	UNSATISFACTORY There are 2 facts that detail the accurate use of scientific notation in a real-world setting. This does NOT include conversion examples.	POOR There are 1 or fewer facts that detail the accurate use of scientific notation in a real-world setting. This does NOT include conversion examples.
Instructional Effectiveness Viewers can see the relationship between very large numbers and scientific notation with positive exponents and between very small numbers with negative exponents.	EXCELLENT There are at least 5 accurate conversion examples using both positive and negative exponents. In addition, there is 'Closure' at the end of Class.	PROPER There are at least 4 accurate conversion examples using both positive and negative exponents. In addition, there is 'Closure' at the end of Class.	SATISFACTORY There are at least 3 accurate conversion examples using both positive and negative exponents. In addition, there is 'Closure' at the end of Class.	UNSATISFACTORY There are at least 2 accurate conversion examples using both positive and negative exponents. In addition, there is 'Closure' at the end of Class.	POOR There are at least 1 accurate conversion examples using both positive and negative exponents. In addition, there is 'Closure' at the end of Class.
Presentation The artifact is neat and easy to read. Viewers want to examine the artifact based on how it appears.	EXCELLENT Information is neatly typed in Microsoft PowerPoint and set up to be viewed as a slide show with 2-4 supporting statements (fact/use/example) per slide. Images that add meaning or context to the statements are included in each slide. Slides are well-organized: neither cluttered nor sparse.	PROPER Information is neatly typed in Microsoft PowerPoint and set up to be viewed as a slide show with 2-4 supporting statements (fact/use/example) per slide. Images that add meaning or context to the statements are included in each slide. Slides are well-organized, but appear somewhat cluttered or sparse.	SATISFACTORY Information is neatly typed in Microsoft PowerPoint and set up to be viewed as a slide show with fewer than 3 supporting (fact/use/example) per slide. Images that add meaning or context to the statements are included in each slide. Slides are well-organized, but sparse.	UNSATISFACTORY Information is neatly typed in Microsoft PowerPoint and set up to be viewed as a slide show with 4-5 supporting (fact/use/example) per slide. Images that add meaning or context to the statements are included in each slide. Slides are well-organized, but cluttered.	POOR Information is neatly typed in Microsoft PowerPoint and set up to be viewed as a slide show. There are far too many/few supporting (fact/use/example) per slide. Slides are very cluttered/sparse.
References A reference (website, magazine, etc) is provided for each image and fact.	EXCELLENT All image and information references are typed in MLA format and provided on the last slide. There are no errors.	PROPER All image and information references are typed in MLA format and provided on the last slide. There are 1-2 minor errors in that information is missing, or the format is wrong.	SATISFACTORY All image and information references are typed in MLA format and provided on the last slide. There are 3-4 minor errors in that information is missing, or the format is wrong.	UNSATISFACTORY Image and information references are in MLA format and provided on the last slide. There are 6-10 minor errors in that information is missing, or the format is wrong.	POOR Image and information references are in MLA format and provided on the last slide. There are major errors in either missing information or the format is wrong.

Keywords:

collage scientific notation algebra pre-algebra middleschool

Subjects:

Math

Types:

Discuss this rubric