Skip to main content

iRubric: Client Goals Concept map rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Client Goals Concept map 
Relational map of factors influencing client performance in the design of clinical treatment goals
Rubric Code: PXB72X6
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Health  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Concept Map
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Relevance to client/disorder

Poor

At least one area noted is unrelated to the client diagnosis or more than one area is related distantly to the diagnosis or infrequently seen.
Fair

At least one area noted is related distantly to the diagnosis or is infrequently seen.
Other areas may be moderately or highly related to diagnosis.
Good

All areas are at least moderately related to diagnosis.
At least one area is highly related to the diagnosis.
Excellent

All areas are highly related to diagnosis.
Rationale

Poor

Rationale is weak or unsupported by evidence based practice with citations for all areas addressed.
Fair

Rationale for inclusion is weak, or unsupported by evidence based practice with citations for more than half of the areas addressed.
Good

Rationale for inclusion includes evidence based practice with citations for at least half of the areas addressed.
Excellent

Rationale for inclusion of all areas include evidence based practice with citations.
Broadness/Completeness

Poor

A minimum of one major area and two subcategories is defined.
Fair

A minimum of two major areas and two subcategories are defined.
Good

A minimum of four major areas and two subcategories in each area are defined.
Excellent

A minimum of five major areas and two subcategories in each area are defined.
Professional writing

Poor

Written language contains more than 5 errors of grammar, syntax, or professional language.
Writing is rarely clear, concise, and relevant. May contain misleading information.
Fair

Written language contains less than 6 errors of grammar, syntax, or professional language.
Writing is sometimes clear, concise, and relevant.
Citations are not written in APA 6 format.
Good

Written language contains less than 3 errors of grammar, syntax, orprofessional language.
Writing is mostly clear, concise, and relevant.
Citations are written in APA 6 format.
Excellent

Written language is correct in grammar, syntax, and professional language. Writing is clear, concise, and relevant. Citations are written in APA 6 format.



Keywords:
  • client, speech-language pathology, goals

Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n224