Skip to main content

iRubric: AP Rhetorical Analysis Essay rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
AP Rhetorical Analysis Essay 
.
Rubric Code: PXB563A
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric AP Rhetorical Analysis Essay
  Brilliant/Excellent

25 pts

Good - Meets

20 pts

Adequate - Approaches

15 pts

Falls Below Standards

10 pts

Fails to Meet Standards

5 pts

Organization

Brilliant/Excellent

•Organization is clear and logical
•Format is followed
•Ratios and Chunks are cohesive and well crafted
6 sentence paragraph
1. What is the Authors Purpose
2. Rhetorical Device/Appeal-Evidence
3. The author____in order to_____.
4. Rhetorical Device/Appeal-Evidence
5. The author____in order to_____.
6. effect on the audience.
Good - Meets

•Organization is clear but not as skillfully done
•Follows format
•Ratios and Chunks are accurate
4 sentence paragraph
1. What is the Authors Purpose
2. Rhetorical Device/Appeal-Evidence
3. The author____in order to_____.
4. effect on the audience.
Adequate - Approaches

•Organization is present but less skillfully done than the " B " papers
•Follows format
•Ratios and Chunks are consistent with 4 sentence paragraph but weaker than "B" papers. :
1. What is the Authors Purpose
2. Rhetorical Device/Appeal-Evidence
3. The author____in order to_____.
4. effect on the audience.
Falls Below Standards

•Does not follow the format (ratio; word counts; sentence layout, if required)
•Organization is unclear or not logical
Intro does not follow the format.
Fails to Meet Standards

Did not meet the minimum requirements
Supporting Evidence and Commentary

Brilliant/Excellent

•Includes excellent concrete details
•Analysis is clearly stated with two pieces of evidence.
•Includes insightful commentary.
•Commentary expands and provides connection to topic sentence and thesis statement
Good - Meets

•Includes good concrete details
•Analysis is clearly stated
•Includes insightful commentary
Adequate - Approaches

•Acceptable concrete details
•Analysis is not clearly stated
•Weak commentary
Falls Below Standards

•Concrete details do not support the claim
Weak commentary
•Analysis is not clearly stated
•Obvious, superficial, simplistic, generic,
or irrelevant commentary
Fails to Meet Standards

Did not meet the minimum requirements
Writing Style

Brilliant/Excellent

•Excellent sentence variety
•Correct and skillful use of transitions
•Powerful vocabulary
Good - Meets

•Above-average sentence variety
•Correct use of transitions
•Good vocabulary
Adequate - Approaches

•Limited sentence variety
•Limited use of transitions
•Average, simple vocabulary
Falls Below Standards

•Little or no sentence variety
•No transitions
•Simple vocabulary or inappropriate word choice
•Uses you, your, yours, would, should, could, may, might
•Uses I, me, my
•Uses contractions
•Uses Shows
Fails to Meet Standards

Did not meet the minimum requirements
Mechanics

Brilliant/Excellent

Very few, if any mechanical errors
Good - Meets

Some mechanical errors may be present
Adequate - Approaches

Some mechanical errors may be present that are noticeable and distracting
Falls Below Standards

Too many mechanical errors
Fails to Meet Standards

Did not meet the minimum requirements



Keywords:
  • Jane Schaffer

Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n58