Skip to main content
iRubric: Robotic Engineering - Sumo rubric

iRubric: Robotic Engineering - Sumo rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Robotic Engineering - Sumo 
Robotic Engineering
This rubric is designed to assess the design of the individual's SUMO robot including programming and competition.
Rubric Code: PXAA892
By howardtj
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Engineering  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric ARMS Rubric
  Level 4

Shows outstanding effort meeting most if not all elements of design criteria

4 pts

Level 3

Shows significant effort, but lacks some elements of the assignment.

3 pts

Level 2

Shows minimal effort w/disregard to assignment instructions.

2 pts

Level 0-1

Shows none to almost no effort.

1 pts

Fanuc Robotics Intro

Level 4

Robot assembles easily, with no errors.

Robot base stable and robust.

Attachments modular, function as expected and easily added/removed from robot.

Attachments perform tasks extremely well and are repeatable.

Base design easily followed with no build issues
Level 3

Slow robot assembly, with 5 or less errors

Robot base stable, but not robust.

Attachments function most of the time;

Base design easily followed with some mistakes made
Level 2

Robot assembly done with 5 to 10 errors.

Robot base structure has some stability.

Attachments difficult to apply; and /or not modular; not precise.

Base weak, falls apart when handled or run.

Base design followed will some difficulty
Level 0-1

Difficulty with robot assembly of base bot

Robot assembly done with more than 10 errors or is not built.

Attachments (Ultrasonic and light sensors) weak and fall apart often; difficulty completing task

Base design not followed easily
Design Process

Level 4

Robot assembles easily, with no errors.

Robot base stable and robust.

Attachments modular, function as expected and easily added/removed from robot. Robot displays wide range of capabilities.

Attachments perform tasks extremely well and are repeatable.

Robot designed by individual design is unique and creative.
Level 3

Slow robot assembly, with 5 or less errors

Robot base stable, but not robust.

Attachments modular; function most of the time; and/or take some time to assemble; somewhat precise and /or repeatable.

Robot designed by individual
Level 2

Robot assembly done with 5 to 10 errors.

Robot base structure has some stability.

Attachments difficult to apply; and /or not modular; not precise or not repeatable.

Base weak, falls apart when handled or run.

Robot show signs of individual's design ideas.
Level 0-1

Difficulty with robot assembly of base bot

Robot assembly done with more than 10 errors or is not built.

Attachments (Ultrasonic and light sensors) weak and fall apart often; difficulty completing task

Robot copied from other designs and not modified by individual
Resources

Level 4

All resources used within constraints and efficiency maximized i.e websites, text
Level 3

Most resources utilized to maximize efficiency i.e websites, text
Level 2

Some resources partially utilized effectively, i.e websites, text
Level 0-1

Little/No resources (e.g., materials and parts) utilized, i.e websites, text
Programming

Level 4

Programs logically organized.

Programs very efficient.

Programs always work, even for complex tasks.

Sensors, if used, guarantee certain actions in every trial.

Programs work in competition as in practice.

Variables, loops, subroutines and conditions, if used, are effective.

Students can describe how
Level 3

Programs organized.

Programs efficient at completing most tasks.

Programs do what they're expected to do.

Sensors used effectively, if used.

Variables, loops, subroutines and conditions, if used, are needed.

Student can describe most of program and its effects.
Level 2

Programs somewhat organized

Programs efficient at completing some tasks.

Results somewhat unpredictable

Programs do some of what is expected

Variables, loops, subroutines and conditions, if used, not understood.
Level 0-1

Programs disorganized

Programs inefficient

Results unpredictable

Sensors inadequately used.

Programs do not accomplish expected tasks.

Variables, loops, subroutines and conditions defined but unused.<BR>

Student can't describe what run will do.
Communication

Level 4

Communicates complete design process, from initial concept through build, test, and refinement.

Excellent/innovative strategy, combining fight tasks, plotting attacks, maximizing points.
Level 3

Basic understanding of design process, evidence of conceptual planning, building, testing, refining of robot, manipulators, programs.

Effective strategic planning, combining fight tasks, program ideas and build designs
Level 2

Some forethought in initial design.
Refinement of robot and programs not communicated.

Strategy often based on ease of task -few risks taken.

Some consideration of time, sensor combinations or maximizing points.
Level 0-1

Uses standard design.

No design process (from initial concept through build, test, refinement) communicated.

Strategy based only on ease of task - did not maximize time, combine tasks or consider points.
Troubleshooting

Level 4

Always performs troubleshooting without being asked. Works on robotic design, programming and features until objectives are achieved.

Identifies multiple issues with redesign

Redesigns robot improving performance in specific areas
Level 3

Can perform troubleshooting most of the time. Moderate success getting robot to achieve attempted objectives.

Identifies issues with performance

Attempts redesign which improves performance to a small degree
Level 2

Recognizes, attempts with little or no success.

Identifies some issues with performance

Attempts limited redesign which does not improve performance
Level 0-1

None

Cannot identify issues

Does not attempt redesign to improve result
Leadership

Level 4

Excellent leader. Clearly leads team and in group settings with all aspects of robot construction, programming and achievement of objectives. Neutralizes disagreements and compromises when appropriate.
Level 3

Can be a good leader. Is cooperative and occasionally helps others in group setting.
Level 2

Very little. Is cooperative and offers some ideas in group settings.
Level 0-1

None; detracts from unity and excellence.
Fanuc Robot Challenge

Level 4

Robot successfully completes challenge with flawless accuracy and error
Level 3

Robot completes challenge with little difficulty and accuracy
Level 2

Robot completes challenge with some difficulty and accuracy
Level 0-1

Robot nonfunctional or unable to complete challenge



Keywords:
  • Robot Design


Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98