Skip to main content
iRubric: AL - 9 WEEK DAILY PLAN/ DAILY REFLECTION EVALUATION rubric

iRubric: AL - 9 WEEK DAILY PLAN/ DAILY REFLECTION EVALUATION rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
AL - 9 WEEK DAILY PLAN/ DAILY REFLECTION EVALUATION 
Daily Plans are submitted during the first 15 minutes of class. Plan formatting is student choice. Reflections are submitted anytime from the last 5 minutes of our designated class time through 11:59 PM of the same school day. Reflections MUST BE 3-5 sentences in length, and they MAY NOT simply state that you "worked on your project" or "followed daily plan exactly." Correct grammar, accurate spelling, proper punctuation and capitalization are required.
Rubric Code: PX4W3A2
By Kobysmommie13
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: (General)  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric AL - 9 WEEK PLAN/REFL EVALUATION
  NADA

0 pts

POOR

1 pts

FAIR

2 pts

GOOD

3 pts

EXCELLENT

4 pts

# of PLANS SUBMITTED

NADA

No plans were submitted.
POOR

1 - 4 plans were submitted.
FAIR

5 - 9 plans were submitted.
GOOD

10 - 13 plans were submitted.
EXCELLENT

14 - 16 plans were submitted.
# of REFLECTIONS SUBMITTED

NADA

No reflections were submitted.
POOR

1 - 4 reflections were submitted.
FAIR

5 - 9 reflections were submitted.
GOOD

10 - 13 reflections were submitted.
EXCELLENT

14 - 16 reflections were submitted.
FORMATTING - PLANS

NADA

None of the submissions are formatted correctly.
POOR

1 - 4 of the submissions are formatted correctly.
FAIR

5 - 9 of the submissions are formatted correctly.
GOOD

10 - 13 submissions are formatted correctly.
EXCELLENT

14 - 16 submissions were formatted correctly.
FORMATTING - REFLECTIONS

NADA

None of the submissions are formatted correctly.
POOR

1 - 4 of the submissions are formatted correctly.
FAIR

5 - 9 of the submissions are formatted correctly.
GOOD

10 - 13 submissions are formatted correctly.
EXCELLENT

14 - 16 submissions were formatted correctly.
WRITING - PLANS - CLARITY

NADA

Demonstrates little to no effective style, including few to no details and/or appropriate description?
POOR

Establishes a limited effective style, including limited details and/or appropriate description?
FAIR

Establishes and maintains a mostly effective style, including some precise details and/or appropriate description?
GOOD

Established and maintains an effective style, including mostly precise details
and/or appropriate description?
EXCELLENT

Establishes and maintains an effective style, including precise details and/or appropriate description?
WRITING - REFLECTIONS - CLARITY

NADA

Demonstrates little to no effective style, including few to no details and/or appropriate description?
POOR

Establishes a limited effective style, including limited details and/or appropriate description?
FAIR

Establishes and maintains a mostly effective style, including some precise details and/or appropriate description?
GOOD

Established and maintains an effective style, including mostly precise details
and/or appropriate description?
EXCELLENT

Establishes and maintains an effective style, including precise details and/or appropriate description?
WRITING - PLAN - CONVENTIONS

NADA

Demonstrates little to no command of the language. Frequent and varied grammar and usage errors are present.
POOR

While limited command of the language exists, a series of grammatical issues may exist.
FAIR

While inconsistent command of the language exists, few patterns of grammatical issues may exist.
GOOD

While command of the language exists, distracting grammatical issues may exist.
EXCELLENT

While command of the language exists, few to no grammatical issues exist.
WRITING - REFLECTIONS - CONVENTIONS

NADA

Demonstrates little to no command of the language. Frequent and varied grammar and usage errors are present.
POOR

While limited command of the language exists, a series of grammatical issues may exist.
FAIR

While inconsistent command of the language exists, few patterns of grammatical issues may exist.
GOOD

While command of the language exists, distracting grammatical issues may exist.
EXCELLENT

While command of the language exists, few to no grammatical issues exist.
WORK ETHIC

NADA

Student does not use classroom project time well OR typically is disruptive to the work of others.
POOR

Student sometimes wastes classroom project time, and occasionally distracts others from their work.
FAIR

Student usually uses classroom project time well, but occasionally distracts others from their work.
GOOD

Student usually uses classroom project time well. Most conversations are focused on the project and things needed to get the work done and are held in a manner that typically does not disrupt others.
EXCELLENT

Student always uses classroom project time well. Conversations are primarily focused on the project and things needed to get the work done and are held in a manner that typically does not disrupt others.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16