iRubric: SOCS 236 rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

SOCS 236

Human Behavior and Social Environment I

Rubric Code: PX4995W

By kwhitenrctc

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Humanities

Type: Project

Grade Levels: (none)

Enter rubric title Enter rubric description
	Poor 0 - 9 (N/A)	Fair 10 - 14 (N/A)	Good 15 - 19 (N/A)	Excellent 20 - 25 (N/A)
Developmental Milestones Describe, analyze, and compare the life-span, social systems, and ecological theories related to growth and development as related to the student's development	Poor No genogram, eco-map, or PIE. Student does not demonstrate knowledge of life cycles and the impact of growth and development.	Fair No evidence of understanding of genogram, eco-map, or PIE. Student makes a discussion regarding their timeline of events in regards to themselves and developmental milestones.	Good Student uses a genogram, eco-map, and PIE, but does not incorporate main points of development to themselves.	Excellent Student relates their genogram, eco-map, and PIE incorporating developmental milestones to each life cycle.
Critical Thinking Demonstrate understanding of the critical inquiry skills appropriate for social work knowledge-building, practice, and assessment.	Poor Project is minimal and does not have enough information for each life cycle or show how assessment is completed and discussed.	Fair Developmental milestones are not fully covered for life cycles. There is little to no in depth understanding of developmental milestones.	Good The student has links some theory in their project, but does not show critical thinking skills through assessment, and conclusion.	Excellent The student uses developmental theorists such as Kohlberg and Piaget to link developmental milestones for each life cycle and incorporates thinking and assessment skills to initiate a conclusion.
Micro, Mezza, Macro PIE Ecological and systemic approaches to understanding the reciprocal interaction between individuals, families, communities, and social institutions.	Poor No evidence of understanding how the environment on each level impacts the student's behavior.	Fair Some information is inferred but not clearly spelled out in regards to themselves and the environment. There is a lack of understanding of how the student is influenced by family and life choices.	Good The student gives some examples of how the environment reinforces their behavior at the micro, mezza, and macro level.	Excellent The student uses assessments to understand and link how their environment enhances who they are as an adult. This will include family interactions, family expectations, and written and unspoken family rules.
Overall Project Creativity, neatness, time spent, all information is included.	Poor Project is missing more than one objective for the project. There is lack of creative expression and missing information.	Fair Typed document, without a timeline or understanding of the life cycle process. Not much time or effort is evident.	Good Project shows some creative expression, with some supporting material. The project meets minimal standards for the project.	Excellent The project is creatively completed with genogram and supporting material. Time was spent gathering information as noted by the detail in the project.

Subjects:

Humanities

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric