iRubric: Digestive Disease Research Brochure rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Digestive Disease Research Brochure

Disease Research Brochure

Students will create an informative and detailed brochure about digestive disease.

Rubric Code: PX27CB3

By noabby2014

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Medical

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 9-12, Undergraduate

Grading Scale
	Excellent 3 pts	Good 2 pts	Fair 1 pts	Incomplete 0 pts
Organization	Excellent Layout is logical and appealing; written communication is focused and interesting	Good Layout is organized; written communication is effective	Fair Layout is haphazard; written communication is functional, but not fully developed	Incomplete Layout is confusing; written communication is limited
Attractiveness	Excellent Text fonts and sizes are well chosen, or if hand written, neatly done; exceptionally attractive formatting	Good Text fonts and sizes, or handwriting are readable; attractive formatting	Fair Text fonts and sizes may cause distraction; if handwritten, hard to read; messy	Incomplete Text fonts and sizes, or handwriting make the brochure very difficult to read; distracting and unattractive formatting; lacks effort
Content	Excellent Brochure contains many details from the research and is exceptionally interesting to read.	Good Brochure contains several details from the research and is interesting to read.	Fair Brochure contains some details from the research and is marginally interesting to read.	Incomplete Brochure contains very few details from the research and is not as interesting to read as it needs to be.
Spelling/Grammar	Excellent No errors are evident	Good No more than 3 errors are evident	Fair No more than 4 errors are evident	Incomplete More than 4 errors are noted
Graphics	Excellent Graphics go well with the text and there is a good mix of text and appropriate graphics	Good Graphics go well with the text, but there are so many that they distract from the text	Fair Graphics go well with the text, but there are too few	Incomplete Graphics do not go with the accompanying text, or appear to be randomly chosen
Group Cohesion	Excellent Equal effort obvious by each member of group. Worked well together.	Good Worked well together. Research and time not equal between members of group.	Fair Worked well together, but with little to no assistance from group members.	Incomplete Did not work well together. Group not effective.