Skip to main content

iRubric: Enzyme Lab Presentation rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Rubric Code: P86XBA
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Science  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Enzyme Lab
Enter rubric description
  Exemplary

100 pts

Proficient

85 pts

Developing

75 pts

Poor

60 pts

Lab Work/Process
15 %

Exemplary

All group members engaged in the lab, all group members too an active role in solving the questions and looking up information; all group members could pass the skills test; the group worked as a team; supported each other and make sure that all members were included. Although there was a leader no one dominated
Proficient

All group members actively participated throughout the entire lab. Each member could pass the skills test.
Developing

The group worked together to find an answer to the challenge. Some of the group members might have been left out or not as active as others. One member may have dominated the conversation and direction. All members could pass the skills test.
Poor

The group worked but could have worked more collaboratively. Some of the members could not pass the skills test.
Handout
15 %

Exemplary

Handout was clear, organized, and easy to follow. It went along with the presentation well. Your handout included all of the relevant information including any relevant pictures. Your question, procedure, data, and conclusions were on the handout.
Proficient

Your handout was organized and easy to follow. Perhaps you were missing some relevant portions or it could have gone better with your presentation.
Developing

You submitted a handout but it was lacking some of the requirements or it was really difficult to follow.
Poor

You turned in a handout but it was very disorganized and missing relevant information.
Presentation
20 %

Exemplary

Presentation was under 3 minutes, was highly organized, and well-prepared. Each group member had a role and they group worked well as a collective group. The Presentation was engaging as well as informative. The slides had a nice balance of content and pictures. The group used pictures from the lab.
Proficient

Presentation was under 3 minutes. Each group member had an assigned role. The presentation was uploaded to the google doc. The presentation was engaging and had more than only text on the screen. The group members refrained from reading the screens.
Developing

Presentation was under 3 minutes and was on the google doc. Some of the group members might not have had a role or the presentation or the presentation could have been more organized. Some of the group members might have read directly from the screen, or the screen included too much text.
Poor

The presentation was under 3 minutes or was not uploaded to the google doc. Some group members might not have participated and/or might have read directly from the screen. The presentation didn't answer all of the questions or seemed generally incomplete.
Lab Procedure - in presentation
10 %

Exemplary

A brief summary of the lab procedure is discussed in the presentation. The steps were summarized so that it was easy to understand what you did to answer your question. It would be easy for another group to follow your procedure and get your same results.
Proficient

A brief summary of the lab procedure is discussed in the presentation. You might have summarized too much in that we could follow your steps or you were too detailed and it was a little difficult to understand what you did.
Developing

You discussed the steps you took in the lab but your procedure was difficult to understand and it might have been too detailed.
Poor

You mentioned the steps you took but you weren't clear in your summary or your steps would be very difficult for a different group to repeat.
Results - in presentation
10 %

Exemplary

The group presented their results in a clear and organized way. A graph or chart was used appropriately. Photos were used to illustrate results.
Proficient

The group presented their results in a clear and organized way. A graph or chart was used to show the results.
Developing

The group presented their results but they could have been more organized. A graph or chart was created but it was difficult to make sense of the it.
Poor

The group presented the results but possibly unorganized and/or didn't use a graph or chart to make reading the results easier.
Conclusion - in presentation
10 %

Enter description

Exemplary

Conclusion answered the hypothesis was based on the evidence collected from the lab. Members referred to the evidence collected and described how it supported the conclusion. Conclusion was thoughtful and demonstrated reflection and analysis.
Proficient

Conclusion answered the hypothesis and was supported by data collected in the lab. Conclusion demonstrated reflection and analysis.
Developing

Conclusion answered the hypothesis but some of the evidence didn't come from the lab data. Conclusion could have been more reflective.
Poor

Conclusion didn't answer the hypothesis and/or the evidence for the conclusion was weak. Analysis of the results might not make sense. The conclusion could include more reflection and analysis.
Further Questions
10 %

Exemplary

Your group used scientific reasoning to develop thoughtful questions that could be explored. You showed that you thought about your conclusion and offered ideas for what other data you needed to strengthen your conclusions.
Proficient

Your asked some thoughtful questions that could be explored through a scientific investigation. You could have shown that you thought more carefully about the meaning of your data.
Developing

You asked questions but they seemed disconnected to your experiment or showed a lack of scientific reasoning.
Poor

You failed to ask further questions.
Professionalism
10 %

Exemplary

All work was submitted on time and in the correct locations. Each member of the group submitted the assignment to Rcampus on time. All work was free of grammatical errors and looked professional.
Proficient

All work was submitted on time and to the correct locations. Each member of the group submitted the assignment to Rcampus on time. Grammatical errors were limited.
Developing

Some of the work was not submitted on time, or they were not submitted in the correct locations, or some of the members submitted their Rcampus assignment late. The handout or presentation might have had grammatical errors
Poor

Some of the work was not submitted on time or to the correct locations. Attention to grammar and spelling is not evident.




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n243