iRubric: History Oral Presentation rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

History Oral Presentation

Galileo - Confess OR Not Confess, can you convince him?

Rubric Code: P7X277

By cknoll

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: History

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 9-12

Category
	Excellent 15 pts	Good 10 pts	Average 5 pts	Fair 1 pts	Poor (N/A)
Quality of Information	Excellent Information clearly relates to Galileo and his trial. Includes relevant information from class readings and textbook and outside information.	Good Information clearly represents Galileo, but information without referencing outside documents.	Average Information represents Galileo, but does not reference more than one document.	Fair Participates but does not reference any documents.	Poor Does not participate.
Creativity	Excellent Lots of creativity used in presentation of point of view and method of convincing to Confess or Not Confess. The key players appeared to be swayed by the presentation	Good Creative, but could have been taken a step further by being more engaged with the key players	Average Creative, but generic and not very engaging, adding your own two cents every now and then.	Fair Not creative, generally agreeing with what everyone else says.	Poor Student is not participating.
Co-Operation	Excellent Works well with partner or partners. Sharing and using ideas others ideas. Equal time given to all participants. This will be evaluated through your individual summaries which highlights the work that your partner or partners and you have each contributed.	Good Worked well together and shared ideas, but one did most of the presenting. This will be evaluated through your individual summaries which highlights the work that your partner or partners and you have each contributed.	Average Somewhat co-operative, but still seemed to do it their own way. This will be evaluated through your individual summaries which highlights the work that your partner or partners and you have each contributed.	Fair Completely uncooperative. This will be evaluated through your individual summaries which highlights the work that your partner or partners and you have each contributed.	Poor Did not work within the context of the group, did not participate in the analysis of the readings, did not participate in discussions. Just sat and stared.
Over all Presentation	Excellent Well done. Enjoyable. Kept the viewers interest. Student knew the material without reading straight from the paper. No 'dead air" between points of view. Convincing to key players to Confess or Not Confess.	Good Interesting. but student did not know the material well. Read information from readings. Somewhat convincing to Confess or Not Confess	Average Viewers attention was not kept. Student did not seemed interested in the material. Not very convincing to Confess or Not Confess.	Fair Choppy, uninteresting, did not flow together. Seemed thrown together, unpracticed. Not convincing to Confess or Not Confess.	Poor Student did not participate.

Subjects:

History

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric