Skip to main content

iRubric: Science Fair Project rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Science Fair Project 
Research Paper Rubric
Rubric Code: P758B9
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Science  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: 6-8

Powered by iRubric Science Fair Rubric
  Great

5 pts

Fair

3 pts

Poor

1 pts

Missing/ Unacceptable

0 pts

Grammar/ Spelling

Great

Final draft is clearly edited. All Grammar and Spelling is used correctly; few or no mistakes are made.
Fair

Final draft would have benefited from another editing session. Some grammar and spelling mistakes are made.
Font size is correct, but margin size is incorrect.
Poor

Final draft is clearly unedited. A great deal of spelling and grammar mistakes are made.
An attempt at correct font and margin size was made.
Missing/ Unacceptable

Spelling and Grammar mistakes interfere with the reading and understanding of the paper.
Rough draft is not included or unedited.
Font and margin sizes are consistently incorrect.
Thesis Statement

Great

Thesis is clear and found at the last sentence of the introductory paragraph. Thesis presents a clear topic for the rest of the paper.
Fair

Thesis is present and in the proper place. Thesis expresses the main topic, however it is not as strong as it could be and does not fully express the main topic.
Poor

Thesis is missing or not a true thesis. Thesis does not relate to the paper or express the main idea of the paper.
Missing/ Unacceptable

No thesis or main idea is stated.
Paragraphs

Great

Each paragraph flows to the next paragraph. Paragraphs follow a logical order. Ideas are logically separated into paragraphs.
Paragraphs are correctly indented with no extra spaces.
Paragraphs are clearly organized and express the author's ideas and paper topic
Fair

Some paragraphs flow to the next paragraph. Most paragraphs follow a logical order.
Paragraphs are occasionally indented correctly.
Poor

Paragraphs do not follow a logical order. Paragraphs are out of order. Both cultures are not compared within paragraphs. Ideas are not logically categorized in paragraphs.
Paragraphs are not correctly indented.
Missing/ Unacceptable

Paragraph form is not used.
Paragraphs are not indented.
Style

Great

Ideas flow from one sentence to another. There is a logical sequence in the sentences and explanations are clear. Transitions between quotes and explanations are clear.
Fair

Some ideas do not flow to the next sentence. Occasionally lacks a logical sentence sequence. Quotes are occasionally dropped.
Poor

Ideas do not easily flow from one sentence to another. There is no logical sequence in the placement of the sentences. Transitions between the quotes and explanations do not exist. Dropped quotes exist.
Missing/ Unacceptable

Style is absent. Paper is confusing and irrelevant.
MLA Format

Great

Each reference is properly cited both within the text--i.e. (Smith 2).
It is double spaced.
A header (student's last name and page number) is in the top right corner of every page.
First page includes the student's name, teacher's name, class and date (day/month/year) in the left corner).
Paper has one inch margins.
Title is included on first page.
Fair

Some references are properly cited both within the text or partially cited.
Paper is double spaced with proper margins.
No header is found.
Date is incorrectly formatted.
Poor

References are improperly cited or not cited at all.
Minimal MLA format
Missing/ Unacceptable

MLA formatting is not used.
Works Cited Page

Great

Works Cited page is included, properly formatted, and at least 5 hard sources (books), maximum 2 soft sources (internet, magazines)
Fair

Part of the Works Cited page was correctly formatted. The proper amount of resources were not used.
Poor

Works Cited page is incomplete and incorrectly formatted.
Missing/ Unacceptable

Works Cited page is missing.
Model

Great

Model is made by the student and obvious work went into it and works well with the topic
Fair

Model is made by the student but appears to be thrown together last minute and works well with the topic.
Poor

Model was bought by the student and works well with topic
Missing/ Unacceptable

No model present or model does not work with topic.
Tri-Fold

Great

Title stands out. Great use of color and pictures present. Word are typed and at a size and font that is easily readable from a distance.
Fair

Title stands out. Some color and pictures. Word are typed but hard to read from distance.
Poor

Hard to read title. Little to no color or picture. Words hand written.
Missing/ Unacceptable

No Tri-Fold present.



Keywords:
  • research paper


Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n224