iRubric: Case study rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Case study

Select an ELL from your field experience and write a report on the progress the student makes throughout the course of the semester.

Rubric Code: P687B4

By srarroyo

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Education

Type: Presentation

Grade Levels: Undergraduate, Graduate

Case study
	Excellent 5 pts	Good 4 pts	Fair 3 pts	Poor 2-0 2 pts
Student description	Excellent Detailed information included in student profile form. Provided detailed rationale for student selection.	Good General information included in student profile form. Provided general rationale for student selection.	Fair Not enough information included in student profile form. Provided a few details to explain student selection.	Poor Incomplete student profile form or not submitted. Barely or no details provided to explain student selection.
Summary	Excellent Insightful summary of experience working with the student.	Good General summary of experience working with the student.	Fair Very few details of experience working with the student.	Poor Barely or no summary of of experience working with the student.
Evidence	Excellent Teaching and assessment tools are very relevant to evaluate second language acquisition.	Good Teaching and assessment tools are relevant to evaluate second language acquisition.	Fair Assessments tools are not completely adequate to evaluate second language acquisition.	Poor Assessments tools are not adequate to evaluate second language acquisition.
Discussion and reflection	Excellent Provided excellent discussion with important main points highlighted that addresses topic. Excellent reflections on experiences with student.	Good Provided good discussion with many of the main points highlighted and addressed the topic most of the time. Good reflections on experiences with student.	Fair Discussion lacked many of the main points and addressed barely the topic. Some reflections on experiences with student.	Poor Weak discussion, no main points extracted and topic was not addressed. Barely or no reflections on experiences with student.
Connections	Excellent Links with theories and practices of ESL and language learning are clear and woven into the paper. Sources from the professional literature are cited.	Good The professional literature is connected with personal experience. Links with theories and practices of ESL and language learning are implied or general, or some sources are not cited.	Fair Professional literature is included without clear connections.	Poor Professional literature is not included or cited.
Conventions and References	Excellent Writing has few or no errors in usage, spelling, and punctuation. Sentence structure is varied. Follows page limit. Used APA format for citations and reference list.	Good Writing has errors in usage, spelling, and/or punctuation. Sentences may be complete but may not flow in readability. Under or above page limit. Used APA format for citations and reference list most of the time.	Fair Usage, spelling, and/or punctuation show serious problems and lack of proofreading. Sentences are simple and unvaried. Pretty under or above page limit. Used APA format for citations and reference list sporadically.	Poor Numerous errors on usage, spelling, grammar, etc. Did not follow page limit. Did not used APA format, but included citations and reference list.

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric