Skip to main content
iRubric: BIOME PROJECT rubric

iRubric: BIOME PROJECT rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
BIOME PROJECT 
AP ESSAY:CELL MEMBRANES
YOUR GROUP SHOULD WORK TO COMPLETE IN ONE OF APPROVED ELECTRONIC FORMATS, A DETAILED REPORT ON YOUR BIOME OF INTEREST. YOU MUST IDENTIFY, DESCRIBE, and ADDRESS: CLIMATE, PLANT LIFE, ANIMAL LIFE, GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION, THREATS TO, AND HUMAN INFLUENCES ON/OVER
Rubric Code: P4WC93
By MGHAIRSTON
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Science  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric BIOMES PROJECT
100 % YOU WILL BE EVALUATED BASED ON YOUR ABILITY TO PERFORM IN ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CATEGORIES
  EXCELLENT

ALL REQUIREMENTS MET AND (3) SOME SURPASSED

5 pts

Good

ALL REQUIREMENTS MET

3.5 pts

Fair

ALL BUT ONE REQUIREMENT HAS BEEN MET

2.5 pts

Poor

MORE THAN ONE REQUIREMENT NOT MET/ INADEQUATELY ADDRESSED

1 pts

INTRODUCTION
5 %

TITLE, NAMES OF GROUP MEMBERS, INTRO. OF EACH...
OVERVIEW/SUMMARY
EXCELLENT

ALL REQUIREMENTS MET AND SURPASSED

INTRODUCTION INCLUDES INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENTS

CREATIVITY OF INTRODUCTION BEING TIED TO OVERVIEW
Good

ALL REQUIREMENTS MET

BUT LACKS CREATIVITY AND OR ORIGINALITY

SUMMARY/OVERVIEW DOESN'T FLOW---> PRESENTATION
Fair

ALL BUT ONE REQUIREMENT HAS BEEN MET

NO CREATIVITY/
ORIGINALITY

SUMMARY/OVERVIEW INCOMPLETE
Poor

MORE THAN ONE REQUIREMENT NOT MET/ INADEQUATELY ADDRESSED

NO OVERVIEW

NO INDIVIDUAL INTRODUCTIONS
ORGANIZATION
10 %

"Does my presentation flow in an organized factual and or chronological order?"
EXCELLENT

Content is well organized using headings or bulleted lists to group related material.
Good

Uses headings or bulleted lists to organize, but the overall organization of topics appears slightly out of order.
Fair

Content is logically organized for the most part.

1-2 slides are in need of rearrangement
Poor

There was no clear or logical organizational structure, just lots of facts.
ORIGINALITY
10 %

" Is is obvious that you have toiled to create original work based on your research?"
EXCELLENT

Presentation shows considerable originality and inventiveness. The content and ideas are presented in a unique and interesting way.
Good

Product shows some original thought. Work shows new ideas and insights.
Fair

Uses other people's ideas (giving them credit), but there is little evidence of original thinking.
Poor

Presentation is a rehash of other people's ideas and/or graphics and shows very little attempt at original thought.

Does not give them credit.
Copy and paste project
BACKGROUND/ILLUSTRATIONS
5 %

" Are your backgrounds and illustrations supportive of your project?"
EXCELLENT

Background/Illustr.

does not detract from text or other graphics. Choice of background is consistent from card to card and is appropriate for the topic.
Good

Background/Illustration
does not detract from text or other graphics.

Choice of background is consistent from card to card.
Fair

Background/Illustration does not detract from text or other graphics.

However, backgrounds are not consistent from slide to slide
Poor

Background/Illustration makes it difficult to see

text competes with other graphics on the page.
SOURCES
5 %

" Did you document all sources? Don't forget pictures too
EXCELLENT

Source information collected for all graphics, facts and quotes. All documented in desired format.
Good

Source information collected for all graphics, facts and quotes. Most documented in desired format.
Fair

Source information collected for most graphics, facts and quotes, but not documented in desired format.
Poor

Very little or no source information was collected.
CONTENT
15 %

"Have you covered all of the content associated with your Biome ?"
EXCELLENT

Covers topic in-depth with details and examples. Subject knowledge is excellent.

Presentation has no misspellings or grammatical errors.
Good

Includes essential knowledge about the topic. Subject knowledge appears to be good.

Presentation has 1-2 misspellings, but no grammatical errors.
Fair

Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors.

Presentation has 1-2 grammatical errors but no misspellings.
Poor

Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors.


Presentation has more than 2 grammatical and/or spelling errors.
EFFECTIVENESS
15 %

"Can we as a class used your project as a study/instructional tool ?"
EXCELLENT

Project includes all material needed to gain a comfortable understanding of the topic. It is a highly effective study guide.
Good

Project includes most material needed to gain a comfortable understanding of the material but is lacking one or two key elements. It is an adequate study guide.
Fair

Project is missing more than two key elements. It would make an incomplete study guide.
Poor

Project is lacking several key elements and has inaccuracies that make it a poor study guide.
PRESENTAION
20 %

" Have you practiced the delivery of your presentation, and it is obvious ?"
EXCELLENT

Well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention.

Speaks clearly and distinctly all (100-95%) the time, and mispronounces no words.

No reading of any slide material
Good

Rehearsed with fairly smooth delivery that holds audience's attention most of the time.

Speaks clearly and distinctly all (100-95%) the time, but mispronounces one word.

Little to no reading of material
Fair

Delivery not smooth, but able to maintain interest of the audience most of the time.

Speaks clearly and distinctly most ( 94-85%) of the time. Mispronounces no more than one word.

Moderate to average reading of material
Poor

Delivery not smooth and audience attention often lost.

Often mumbles or can not be understood OR mispronounces more than one word.

Too much reading of information
Proffesionalism/Attire
5 %

" Is your group conducting itself in a professional manner ?"
Before & After...
EXCELLENT

Business attire, very professional look.

Body language appropriate at all times

Group interactions...strictly business
Good

Casual business attire.

or

Body language and or group interactions distracting to audience
Fair

Casual business attire, but wore sneakers or seemed somewhat wrinkled.
or
Group interactions (more than 1) detract from quality of presentation
Poor

General attire not appropriate for audience (torn, ripped, or wrinkled jeans, t-shirt, shorts).

Attire or actions detract from presentation

Dress or actions distracting....
WORKLOAD
10 %

" Did all members of the group contribute equally without complaint ?"
EXCELLENT

The workload is divided and shared equally by all team members.

There is no obvious dysfunction in group.
Good

The workload is divided and shared fairly by all team members, though workloads may vary from person to person.

Concerns are present and have been confirmed.
Fair

The workload was divided, but one person in the group is viewed as not doing his/her fair share of the work.

Remainder of group makes up for lack of effort.
Poor

The workload was not divided OR several people in the group are viewed as not doing their fair share of the work.

Remainder of group does not make up for lack of effort.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98