iRubric: Class Names Project rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Class Names Project

M7D1.b Construct frequency distributions. M7D1.c Analyze data using measures of central tendency. M7D1.f Analyze data using appropriate graphs. M7P1.b Solve problems that arise in math and in other context. M7P1.c Apply and adapt a variety of appropriate strategies to solve problems. M7P2.d Select and use various types of reasoning and methods of proof.

Rubric Code: P2X9CC

By jmdennis

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: Math

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 6-8

Class Names Project Enter rubric description
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts
Graphing Names Enter criteria description	Poor Names are not in rows, and letters are not one per box.	Fair Some names are in a row, and some letters are not one per box.	Good All names are in a row, and all letters are one per box.
Total Column Enter criteria description	Poor Student did not count the number of letters per row and record in last column.	Fair Student counted some of the number of letters per row and recorded them in the last column.	Good Student counted all of the number of letters per row and recorded them in the last column.
Frequency Table Enter criteria description	Poor Student did not attempt to create the frequency table.	Fair Student completed part of the frequency table but errors were present and/or not complete.	Good Student completed the frequency table without errors.
Line Plot	Poor Student did not attempt to create the line plot.	Fair Student completed part of the line plot but errors were present and/or not complete.	Good Student completed the line plot without errors.
mean and Mode	Poor Student did not attempt to create the calculate the mean and mode.	Fair Student attempted to caculate the mean and mode but errors were present and/or not complete.	Good Student calculated the mean and mode with accuracy.
Extension Activity	Poor Student did not attempt to answer question.	Fair Student attempted to answer question but answer was incorrect and/or reasoning was not present.	Good Student calculated answer with accuracy and reasoning was correct.
Neatness	Poor Work was not organized or legible.	Fair Work was somewhat organized and legible.	Good Work was organized and legible.