iRubric: case study (generic template) rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

case study (generic template)

The student will develop a performance problem case that he or she is currently experiencing. Once the performance problem situation is properly defined, the student will then apply the subject matter learned in class to create a plan of action to deal with the performance problem. The purpose is to emphasize the problem analysis process and have the student utilize critical thinking skills. The case is based on 100% which will convert to 100 points.

Rubric Code: NXX28BB

By venuagri

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: Business

Type: Assessment

Grade Levels: Post Graduate

Management Case Project
	Excellent Answers Well Above Average 4 pts	Good Answers Above Average 3.4 pts	Poor Answers Wrong or Incomplete. 2.4 pts	Not Acceptable No answer provided. 0 pts	Fair Answers Adequate. 3 pts
Defining the Problem	Excellent Problem is completely defined and answers to related questions demonstrate extra effort.	Good Problem adequately defined. Related questions adequately answered.	Poor Parts of the assignment incomplete and/or problem not identified properly.	Not Acceptable Assignment not submitted.	Fair Problem briefly defined and related questions briefly answered. Could be more complete.
Listing Facts and Assumptions	Excellent Listed all relevant facts and and assumptions. All facts and assumptions were directly related to the analysis of the problem.	Good Listed most relevant facts and assumptions. Did not list assumptions as facts. Most facts relevant to the problem.	Poor Did not adequately list all facts and assumptions and/or confused facts and assumptions.	Not Acceptable Section left blank.	Fair Listed a few basic facts and assumptions. Some assumptions listed as facts. Some facts not related to the problem.
Determining Causes-1	Excellent All leadership questions well thought out and answered completely. Showed direct connection to the problem definition and the stated facts and assumptions. Showed critical thinking skills.	Good All leadership analysis questions answered completely but all the answers were not directly connected to the problem situation and the facts.	Poor Did not adequately determine possible leadership causes. Some questions not answered.	Not Acceptable Section left blank.	Fair Adequately responded to all leadership analysis questions. Showed minimal analysis.
Determining Causes-2	Excellent All motivational questions well thought out and answered completely. Showed direct connection to the problem definition and the stated facts and assumptions. Showed critical thinking skills.	Good All motivational analysis questions answered completely but all the answers were not directly connected to the problem situation and the facts.	Poor Did not adequately determine possible motivational causes. Some questions not answered.	Not Acceptable Section left blank.	Fair Adequately responded to all motivational analysis questions. Showed minimal analysis.
Determinong Causes-3	Excellent All ability questions well thought out and answered completely. Showed direct connection to the problem definition and the stated facts and assumptions. Showed critical thinking skills.	Good All ability analysis questions answered completely but all the answers were not directly connected to the problem situation and the facts.	Poor Did not adequately determine possible ability causes. Some questions not answered.	Not Acceptable Section left blank.	Fair Adequately responded to all ability analysis questions. Showed minimal analysis.
Additional Information	Excellent Recognized all the critical information still needed to develop a plan.	Good Recognized most of the critical information still needed to develop a plan.	Poor Did not recognize what additional information was needed.	Not Acceptable Section left blank.	Fair Recognized some of the additional information needed.
Setting Objectives	Excellent Very specific about the expected behavior, very clear on how performance would be measured, and very specific about when the performance was to improve.	Good Specific about the expected behavior, clear on how performance would be measured, and specific about when the performance was to improve. Or, somewhat specific about the what was to be done, how it was the be measured, or the time frame.	Poor Did not clarify what the expected behavior was to be, how it was to be measured, or when the performance was to be improved.	Not Acceptable Section left blank.	Fair General about the expected behavior, somewhat clear on how performance would be measured, and somewhat clear about when the performance was to improve. Or, was vague about the what was to be done, how it was the be measured, or the time frame.
Developing Alternative Plan 1	Excellent The alternative was well thought out and specifically focused on the identified causes; adverse consequences were complete and very clearly defined. Showed creativity.	Good The alternative was appropriate and very closely tied to the identified causes. The adverse consequences were well defined.	Poor Alternative incomplete and/or not well thought out.<BR> Adverse consequences not listed or not appropriate.	Not Acceptable Section left blank.	Fair The alternative was appropriate and was somewhat related to the identified causes. The adverse consequences were basically defined.
Developing Alternative Plan 2	Excellent The alternative was well thought out and specifically focused on the identified causes; adverse consequences were complete and very clearly defined. Showed creativity.	Good The alternative was appropriate and very closely tied to the identified causes. The adverse consequences were well defined.	Poor Alternative incomplete and/or not well thought out.<BR> Adverse consequences not listed or not appropriate.	Not Acceptable Section left blank.	Fair The alternative was appropriate and was somewhat related to the identified causes. The adverse consequences were basically defined.
Developing Alternative Plan 3	Excellent The alternative was well thought out and specifically focused on the identified causes; adverse consequences were complete and very clearly defined. Showed creativity.	Good The alternative was appropriate and very closely tied to the identified causes. The adverse consequences were well defined.	Poor Alternative incomplete and/or not well thought out.<BR> Adverse consequences not listed or not appropriate.	Not Acceptable Section left blank.	Fair The alternative was appropriate and was somewhat related to the identified causes. The adverse consequences were basically defined.
Selecting the Best Plan	Excellent The best alternative was selected and the rationale was directly related to the facts, assumptions, and identified or possible causes.	Good A good plan was selected and the rationale was mostly related to the facts, assumptions, and identified or possible causes.	Poor Plan selected (might not be the best one)but rationale faulty.	Not Acceptable Section left blank.	Fair Plan selected that might not be the best and the rationale was adequate but not directly related to the facts, assumptions, and identified or possible causes.

Keywords:

Management Case study - generic template for oral and written

Subjects:

Business

Types:

Discuss this rubric