Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Webber v. Sondheim Debate rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Webber v. Sondheim Debate
The Great Debate - Tuck Everlasting
Students will debate the careers of Webber and Sondheim
Rubric Code:
NXC8A9A
By
hware228
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Music
Type:
Assignment
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Debate
Exceeds Expectations
4 pts
Meets Expectations
3 pts
Somewhat Meets Expectations
2 pts
Doesn't Meet Expectations
1 pts
Research Powerpoint
Exceeds Expectations
The student completely understood the topic in-depth and presented the information clearly. All relevant information is included.
Meets Expectations
The student mostly understood the topic in-depth and presented the information mostly clearly. Most relevant information is included.
Somewhat Meets Expectations
The student somewhat understood the topic in-depth and presented the information somewhat clearly. Some relevant information is included.
Doesn't Meet Expectations
The student did not understand the topic in-depth and did not presented the information clearly. No relevant information is included.
Opening Statement
Exceeds Expectations
Opening statement clearly defines the viewpoint of the team and briefly lists their 3 major points in a clever and interesting way.
Meets Expectations
Opening statement clearly defines the viewpoint of the team and briefly lists their 3 major points in a somewhat interesting way.
Somewhat Meets Expectations
Opening statement attempts to clearly define the viewpoint of the team and briefly lists 2 major points.
Doesn't Meet Expectations
Opening statement doesn't define the viewpoint and doesn't list major reasons.
Major Points
Exceeds Expectations
Points clearly express their viewpoint, including at least 3 details and examples to support their answer in a highly persuasive manner.
Meets Expectations
Points clearly express their viewpoint, including at least 3 details and examples to support their answer in a somewhat interesting way.
Somewhat Meets Expectations
Points attempt to clearly express their viewpoint, including only 2 details and examples to support their answer.
Doesn't Meet Expectations
Points attempt to clearly express their viewpoint, including only 1 detail and example to support their answer.
Rebuttal
Exceeds Expectations
All counter-arguments were accurate, relevant and strong. Was able to accurately defend position.
Meets Expectations
Majority of counter-arguments were accurate, relevant and strong. Was able to defend position.
Somewhat Meets Expectations
Some of counter arguments were accurate, relevant and strong. Was somewhat able to defend position.
Doesn't Meet Expectations
Counter-arguments were not accurate and/or relevant. Was unable to defend position.
Concluding Statement
Exceeds Expectations
Concluding statement clearly sums up the viewpoint of the student and briefly lists their 3 major points in a clever and interesting way.
Meets Expectations
Concluding statement clearly sums up the viewpoint of the student and briefly lists their 3 major points in a somewhat interesting way.
Somewhat Meets Expectations
Opening statement attempts to clearly sum up the viewpoint of the student and briefly lists 2 major points.
Doesn't Meet Expectations
Opening statement doesn't sum up the viewpoint and doesn't list major reasons.
Respect for Other Team
Exceeds Expectations
All statements and responses were respectful and appropriate. Never interrupted or talked over other team members.
Meets Expectations
Most statements and responses were respectful and appropriate. Never interrupted or talked over other team members.
Somewhat Meets Expectations
Most statements and responses were respectful and appropriate. Seldom interrupted or talked over other team members.
Doesn't Meet Expectations
Statements and responses were consistently not respectful. Consistently interrupted other team or talked over other team members.
Subjects:
English
Music
Education
Types:
Assignment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Assignment rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.