Skip to main content
iRubric: Passion Project - Phase 3 - Presentation & Recommendations rubric

iRubric: Passion Project - Phase 3 - Presentation & Recommendations rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Passion Project - Phase 3 - Presentation & Recommendations 
Oral Communication VALUE Rubric
Presentation & Recommended Solutions
Rubric Code: NXBX5W8
By Lacy_Ellis
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Social Sciences  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Presentation
  Excellent

20 pts

Good

15 pts

Fair

10 pts

Poor

5 pts

Organization & Thoroughness

Excellent

Organizational pattern (specific introduction and conclusion, sequenced material within the body, and transitions) is clearly and consistently observable and is skillful and makes the content of the presentation cohesive.

All components from Phase 1 and Phase 2 are included, in addition to the recommendations and a way forward. The slide requirement was met.
Good

Organizational pattern (specific introduction and conclusion, sequenced material within the body, and transitions) is clearly and consistently observable within the presentation.

All components from Phase 1 and Phase 2 are included though some more than others, in addition to the recommendations and a way forward. The slide requirement was met.
Fair

Organizational pattern (specific introduction and conclusion, sequenced material within the body, and transitions) is intermittently observable within the presentation.

Most components from Phase 1 and Phase 2 are included, in addition to the recommendations and a way forward. The slide requirement was not met, but close.
Poor

Organizational pattern (specific introduction and conclusion, sequenced material within the body, and transitions) is not observable within the presentation.

Few components from Phase 1 and Phase 2 are included, the recommendations and way forward was unclear. The slide requirement was not met.
Delivery/Appearance

Excellent

Language in presentation is appropriate to audience. Delivery techniques (posture, gesture, eye contact, and vocal expressiveness) make the presentation compelling, and speaker appears polished and confident. Speaker is clean, neat, and dressed appropriately for the occasion.
Good

Language in presentation is appropriate to audience. Delivery techniques (posture, gesture, eye contact, and vocal expressiveness) make the presentation interesting, and speaker appears comfortable. Speaker is clean, neat, and dressed appropriately for the occasion.
Fair

Language in presentation is appropriate to audience most of the time. Delivery techniques (posture, gesture, eye contact, and vocal expressiveness) make the presentation understandable, and speaker appears tentative. Speaker gave little thought to their appearance.
Poor

Language in presentation is not appropriate to audience. Delivery techniques (posture, gesture, eye contact, and vocal expressiveness) detract from the understandability of the presentation, and speaker appears uncomfortable. Speaker was dressed inappropriately for the occasion.
Supporting Material

Excellent

A variety of types of supporting materials (explanations, examples, illustrations, statistics, analogies, quotations from relevant authorities) make appropriate reference to information or analysis that significantly supports the presentation or establishes the presenter's credibility/authority on the topic.
Good

Supporting materials (explanations, examples, illustrations, statistics, analogies, quotations from relevant authorities) make appropriate reference to information or analysis that generally supports the presentation or establishes the presenter's credibility/authority on the topic.
Fair

Supporting materials (explanations, examples, illustrations, statistics, analogies, quotations from relevant authorities) make appropriate reference to information or analysis that partially supports the presentation or establishes the presenter's credibility/authority on the topic.
Poor

Insufficient supporting materials (explanations, examples, illustrations, statistics, analogies, quotations from relevant authorities) make reference to information or analysis that minimally supports the presentation or establishes the presenter's credibility/authority on the topic.
Analysis
  Excellent

30 pts

Good

20 pts

Fair

10 pts

Poor

0 pts

Recommendations and Improvements

Excellent

The student formulated a recommendation that has a strong potential for success. All of the critical concepts were thoroughly addressed. Central message is compelling (precisely stated, appropriately repeated, memorable, and strongly supported.)
Good

The student formulated a recommendation that has a strong potential for success. All of the critical concepts were addressed. Central message is clear and consistent with the supporting material.
Fair

The student applied a recommendation that has the potential to be beneficial. Most of the critical concepts were addressed. Central message is basically understandable but is not often repeated and is not memorable.
Poor

The student applied a recommendation; however, the recommendation was not well aligned to the problem and would most likely be ineffective. Many of the critical concepts were only minimally addressed. Central message can be deduced, but is not explicitly stated in the presentation.
Future
  Excellent

10 pts

Good

8 pts

Fair

6 pts

Poor

2 pts

A Way Forward

Excellent

Student has given ample thought to how this project will impact him/her and how he/she will be able to use this project into the future throughout his/her educational journey and beyond.

Specific examples are given of how this project will live on.
Good

Student has given some thought to how this project will impact him/her and how he/she will be able to use this project into the future throughout his/her educational journey and beyond.
Fair

Student has given little thought to how this project will impact him/her and how he/she will be able to use this project into the future throughout his/her educational journey and beyond.
Poor

Student has not considered how this project will impact him/her and how he/she will be able to use this project into the future throughout his/her educational journey and beyond.

The project will end here for the student.



Keywords:
  • Oral communication, Central message, Delivery techniques, Supporting material, Language



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16