iRubric: Mandarin Weather Forecast Video Project rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Mandarin Weather Forecast Video Project

Students will create a video that will be 2 to 5 minutes in length. Choices include: a game show, a newscast, weather report, a soap-opera, a talk show, etc. All video must have Chinese character captions and student voice recording.

Rubric Code: NX4C346

By Carolbi

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Foreign Languages

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 9-12

Video Production
	Excellent 20 pts	Good 17 pts	Fair 14 pts	Poor 10 pts	Not Complete 6 pts
Script Grammar	Excellent There were hardly any grammar / spelling errors (1-2)	Good There were few grammar / spelling errors (3-4)	Fair There were many grammar / spelling errors (5-7)	Poor There were numerous errors that made it difficult to understand (8-10)	Not Complete 11 or more errors.
Usage vocabulary and grammar	Excellent Beyond chapter vocabulary and used all sentence patterns from the chapter.	Good Vocabulary words and grammar from the chapter were used.	Fair Only words from the chapter were used and a limited usage of the grammar	Poor Limited words and grammar from the chapter were used <BR> Not Complete	Not Complete No words from the chapter were used
Pronunciation/Dialogue	Excellent Group is fluent, pronounces all words correctly. Uses complex ideas, native-like flow of speech.	Good In the group almost all words were pronounced correctly with the exception of 1-2 words. Uses more complex language, but with pauses or chunks.	Fair In the group some words were pronounced correctly with the exception of 3-4 words. Uses simple sentences.	Poor In the group many words were pronounced incorrectly. 5-6 words were pronounced incorrectly Language is choppy and disconnected.	Not Complete 7 + words were pronounced incorrectly
Acting & Originality	Excellent Great clarity, voice projection, no laughing that obscures scene, speaking in complete sentences. Unique and exciting. Oscar worthy material!	Good Missing one of the previous elements	Fair Missing two of the previous elements	Poor Missing more than 2 elements or you can't understand or hear.	Not Complete Missing all elements.
Use of Technology	Excellent Excellent editing. Different scenes in video flow together naturally. The overall product is very convincing and well thought out.	Good Good editing. There is good flow between scenes. The end result is well adapted and convincing.	Fair Adequate editing. Some aspects of film do not flow together well. The end result is convincing but more direction and fluidity is needed.	Poor Poorly edited. video does not flow/not convincing. Parts are hard to understand or lack structure or direction. Not well thought out.	Not Complete No editing. No video.
Teamwork	Excellent All members contributed an equal significant role to the film.	Good All members contributed to the project, but some members did not play as significant a role in the production as a whole.	Fair All members al least contributed something. Some members are far less prominent in the production and video than others.	Poor Not all members contributed to the project. or one or more of the project members contributed almost nothing to the production.	Not Complete No members contributed to the project.
Due on time	Excellent Works completed and due on the due date	Good Works completed and due one day later than the due date	Fair Works completed and due three days later than the due date	Poor Works completed and due a week later than the due date	Not Complete Works not completed
Required Information included	Excellent All required information is included in the script and presentation.	Good Most information is included in the script and presentation	Fair Some information is included in the script and presentation	Poor Little Information is included in the script and presentation	Not Complete Extremely little information is included
Visual aids	Excellent Used Visual aids in the project, and it is quite interesting, supports the presentation	Good Used visual aids in the project, but it is not vivid	Fair Used visual aids in the project, but it is not organized at all	Poor Used visual aids in the project, but not no quality at all, not related to the topic	Not Complete Not used visual aids
Script Neatness	Excellent All the writing ( typing) are neat and readable, very clear paragraphs	Good All the writing ( typing) are readable, paragraphs are not shown	Fair All the writing( typing) are completed, no clear paragraph	Poor All the writing ( typing) due without a hard copy	Not Complete All the writing ( typing) are messy and not readable

Keywords:

Video, Spanish

Subjects:

Foreign Languages

Types:

Discuss this rubric