Skip to main content
iRubric: Architectural Initial Sketches rubric

iRubric: Architectural Initial Sketches rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Architectural Initial Sketches 
Given client based specifics and several site options, students are to prepare and complete a working set of Drawings. This is to access their initial sketches and ideas for project. It is a work in progress not meant to be 100% complete but done to what has been covered in curriculum.
Rubric Code: NX3XBB3
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Arts and Design  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Architectural Sketches
100 %
  Unsatisfactory

25 pts

Below Standard

50 pts

Meets Standard

75 pts

Meets or Exceeds

100 pts

Initial Plans
20 %

Floor plans w/wall thickness, room sizes, overall dimensions and window/door locations. Front elevation sketch

Unsatisfactory

Failure to Present any of required criteria:
Below Standard

Presentation of some required criteria (3 or more missing) floor plans with wall thickness, room sizes/names,overall dimensions and window/door locations. front sketch
Meets Standard

Presentation of most required criteria (1-2 missing) floor plans with wall thickness, room sizes/names,overall dimensions and window/door locations. front sketch
Meets or Exceeds

Presentation of all required criteria: floor plans with wall thickness, room sizes/names,overall dimensions and window/door locations. front sketch
Accuracy of Design
15 %

Proper traffic flow,
structural continuity,
matching clients expectations, realistic functionality.

Unsatisfactory

not much thought in layout. no equipment accommodations, poor traffic flow, most of the clients request were not met. There are many issues with structural integrity, The functionality of the spaces does not work.
Below Standard

not much thought in layout. there are inadequate equipment accommodations, poor traffic flow, most of the clients request were met. There are some issues with structural integrity, The functionality of some of the spaces does not work well.
Meets Standard

Carefully thought out layout. there are equipment accommodations, traffic flow works okay,most of the clients request were met. There are no issues with structural integrity, The functionality of all the spaces works well.
Meets or Exceeds

Carefully thought out layout. Proper equipment accommodations, traffic flow works well, the clients request were all met. There are no issues with structural integrity, The functionality of all the spaces works well.
Participation in class
30 %

drawing/reviewing initial plans. Asking questions throughout revisions and final drafting. progressing steadily through final drawings stage

Unsatisfactory

most time in class was not spent working on initial plans,rough drafts, reviews w/instructor. Constantly required redirection of time management throughout the project. Absent 3+ days of the required class time.
Below Standard

Some of Time in class spent working on initial plans, preparing rough drafts, reviewing w/instructor and making revisions. frequently, required redirection of time management throughout the project. Absent 3+ days of the required class time.
Meets Standard

Most of Time in class spent working on initial plans, preparing rough drafts, reviewing w/instructor and making revisions. Occasionally, required redirection of time management throughout the project. Absent 1-2 days of the required class time.
Meets or Exceeds

Time in classroom spent working on initial plans, preparing rough drafts, reviewing with instructor and making revisions. Very good self time management displayed throughout the entire project start to completion. Present for entire class requirements
Research of Project
20 %

Specifications
Fire and ADA Egress Site Requirements
Building limits/restrictions
Type of construction
Type/amount of occupancy. Fixture requirements etc....

Unsatisfactory

No research was completed, nothing documented. To ensure proper codes/restrictions were followed for the project, everything would need to be researched further.
Below Standard

little research was completed, nothing documented. To ensure proper codes/restrictions were followed for the project, more than 3 would need to be researched further.
Meets Standard

some research was completed/documented to ensure proper codes/restrictions were followed for most of the project. 1-2 of the needed specifications were overlooked.
Meets or Exceeds

Thorough research was completed/documented to ensure proper codes/restrictions were followed for entire project
Overall Impression
15 %

Neatness
completeness
on schedule
comprehensiveness

Unsatisfactory

Preliminary drawings are less than 70% complete per semester syllabus specifications. They are not assembled properly, not understandable or neatly done. They are not submitted on time.
Below Standard

Preliminary drawings are less than 90% complete per semester syllabus specifications. They are not assembled properly, not understandable or neatly done. They are not submitted on time.
Meets Standard

Preliminary drawings are less than 100% complete per semester syllabus specifications. They are assembled properly,understandable or neatly done. They are submitted on time.
Meets or Exceeds

Preliminary drawings are 100% complete per semester syllabus specifications. They are assembled properly, understandable, neatly done and submitted on time.



Keywords:
  • floor plans, working drawing, house layout, blueprints,dimensions,elevations


Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98