iRubric: Grade 4 Province Project rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Grade 4 Province Project

Rubric Code: NX26A7

By pambelina

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: Social Sciences

Type: Project

Grade Levels: K-5, 6-8, 9-12, Undergraduate

Grade 4 Province Project
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Oraganization of Material	Poor - Project layout is unorganized and unreadable. - NO headings present - no organized flow to presentation of material.	Fair - Student shows some organization of material but could be more neatly presented - Some headings for material presented - Some organization of material but still very sporadic with presentation	Good - Project is organized and laid out in an organized and readable manner - Student has information labeled with headings - There is a good flow of material presented.(pictures match written work)	Excellent - Project is efficiently organized and materials is legible - Extra effort has been given in the presentation of material (color on headings) - Excellent flow when reading and presenting material
Grammar/Langauge	Poor - Limited writing conventions present (i.e spelling, poncutation and grammar) - No corrections made to good copy.	Fair - Student demonstrates few writing conventions (i.e spelling, ponctuation and grammar) - Many errors in good copy	Good - Student demonstrates most writing conventions (ie. spelling, ponctuation and grammar) - Most corrections have been made for the good copy	Excellent - All or most writing conventions of writing (i.e.spelling, ponctutation and grammar - Corrections have been made to good copy.
Development of Ideas	Poor - Few key points are presented about the province with detail - Information presented shows limited understanding of key points of the province studied ( population, important geographical information)	Fair - Some key points are presented about the province with detail - Information presented shows some understanding of key points of the province studied ( population, important geographical information)	Good - Most key points are presented about the province with detail - Information presented shows understanding of key points of the province studied ( population, important geographical information)	Excellent - Key points are presented about the province with great detail. - Information presented shows excellent understanding of key points of the province studied ( population, important geographical information) - Student provided additional information on the province
Oral Presentation - Communication	Poor - Frequent pronounciation errors; hesitant delivery - Constantly relies on notes; does not make eye contact; speaks inaudibly - Body language distracts; student seems unsure and lacks confidence	Fair - Some pronouciation errors; hesitant delivery - Often relies on notes: makes limited eye contact; often inaudible. - Body language and posture does not distract; student appears to have little confidence	Good - Very few pronounciation errors; smooth delivery - Rarely relies on notes; makes eye contact with a great variety of peers; speaks clearly and audible - Body language conveys interest on the topic; student appears somewhat confident	Excellent - Excellent pronounciation; natural delivery - Does not rely on notes; makes eye contact with ease; speaks audibly and with expression - Body language conveys enthusiams about the topic; student looks relaxed and confident
Oral Presentation- Knowledge	Poor - Appropriate and effective vocabulary (student lacks the vocabulary necessary) - Does not meet assignment criteria	Fair - Appropriate and effective vocabulary (student has learned some of the vocabulary necessary) - Shows and effort to meet assignement criteria	Good - Appropriate and effective vocabulary (student has learned the vocabulary necessary) - Meets assignment criteria	Excellent - Confident use of subject-specific vocabulary ( Student uses advanced and rich vocabulary) - Meets assignment criteria and goes beyond

Subjects:

Social Sciences

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric