iRubric: Jackson's Policies and Native Americans Research Project rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Jackson's Policies and Native Americans Research Project

Students will work in groups to research an indigenous Indian group from Indiana using this guiding question: How did the Indian removal Act Impact indigenous groups and how did their experience of removal and relocation compare to the Cherokee? They will create a display and present their findings to the class.

Rubric Code: NBC93B

By ostrovr

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: History

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 9-12

Enter rubric title
	Good 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Poor 1 pts
Content	Good The content was well researched and thorough. Addresses all the major questions. Stays on topic.	Fair Content could be more detailed, but covers what it needs to cover. Addresses most of the questions. Strays occasionally from the topic.	Poor Content is not well developed and is lacking in depth and detail. Fails to answer most of the guiding questions. Topic of content is unclear.
Organization	Good Content is very well organized and easy to follow.	Fair Content is organized, but could use more work. Some things challenging to follow or read.	Poor No obvious organization or flow.
Attractiveness/ Neatness	Good Makes excellent use of font, graphics, and effects to enhance report. Pictures and words are grouped well and enhance the presentation.	Fair Makes use of font, color or graphics but occasionally distract from the presentation of content.	Poor Use of font, graphics or effects distracts from the presentation of content. Looks messy and hard to read or understand.
Mechanics	Good 0-2 misspellings or grammatical errors.	Fair Three or fewer misspellings and/or mechanical errors.	Poor More than four errors in spelling or grammar.
Presentation	Good Rehearsed with fairly smooth delivery that holds audience attention most of the time. speaks clearly and distinctively most of the time. Volume is loud enough for most of the presentation.	Fair Delivery not smooth, but able to maintain interest of the audience most of the time. Speaks clearly and distinctively some of the time. Volume is somewhat loud enough for audience to hear.	Poor Delivery not smooth and audience attention often lost. Mumbles or cannot be understand. Volume is often too soft to be heard by audience.
Listening to Presentations	Good Sits quietly and looks interested most of the time. Not getting distracted or causing a distraction.	Fair Sits mostly quietly and looks interested some of the time. Occasionally gets distracted or distracts others.	Poor Not sitting quietly, being disrespectful by causing distractions.
Working as a Group	Good Group members got along well and required no interventions. No complaints were filed. All members carried their weight in the group.	Fair Group members got along most of the time. Some complaints were filed and minor interventions were needed. The work load was almost evenly distributed.	Poor Group members did not get along well with each other. Interventions were frequent. Work load not distributed evenly.

Keywords:

Center on Congress, Native Americans, Cherokee, Indigenous, Indiana

Subjects:

History

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric