Skip to main content

iRubric: Lord of the Flies Notebook rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Lord of the Flies Notebook 
Lord of the Flies Notebook
Rubric Code: NA3665
By sallybranch
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Humanities  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Lord of the Flies Notebook
  Minimal development

6 pts

Sufficient

8 pts

Exemplary

10 pts

Title

Minimal development

Minimal discussion of title and its connection to chapter; little if any discussion of both literal and metaphorical meanings; no mention of possible reason for author's choice of title.
Sufficient

Discussion of title well-developed, but little or no attention paid to diction/function;explanation of connection to some of chapter's action; mention of literal and metaphorical meanings but insufficient support for claims; reason for author's choice of title explained, but little use of supporting evidence.
Exemplary

Fully developed discussion that includes analysis of chapter title diction and function,connection to action in chapter, explanation of title's literal and metaphorical meanings, presentation of plausible reason for author's choice of title. Claims that can be are supported with mention of chapter events.
Opening scene

Minimal development

Significance of opening scene mentioned but not discussed in detail; brief mention of connection between scene and chapter; little support from chapter to support claim about significance; internal character events
Sufficient

Significance of opening scene in relation to rest of chapter is expressed in a logical claim; evidence from chapter is used to support claim; internal character events (psychological, moral, emotional) are used to explain some action in chapter.
Exemplary

Significance of opening scene in relation to rest of chapter is expressed in a logical claim; evidence from chapter is used to fully support claim; all internal character events (psychological, moral, emotional) are used to explain all action in chapter.
Rhetoric

Minimal development

Limited discussion of diction, syntax, imagery, figurative language, tone. Little explanation or support of how passage furthers meaning.
Sufficient

Discussion of diction, syntax, imagery, figurative language, and tone in three chosen passages; explanation of how passages further meaning.
Exemplary

Sophisticated discussion of diction, syntax, imagery, figurative language, and tone in three chosen passages; specific explanation of how passages further meaning.
Character

Minimal development

Choice of character questionable for topic and chapter; attempt is made to support character claims with textual references.
Sufficient

Choice of character makes sense for topic and chapter; character claims supporte with textual references.
Exemplary

Obviously logical choice of character for topic and chapter; insightful and valid discussion; character claims well-supported with every available textual reference.
Chapter Ending

Minimal development

Explanation of appropriateness of ending ties logically to chapter events; insightful comments at both literal and metaphorical levels; foreshadowing function mentioned only briefly, if at all.
Sufficient

Explanation of appropriateness of ties to chapter events; foreshadowing function mentioned only briefly, if at all.
Exemplary

Explanation of appropriateness of ending ties logically to chapter events; insightful comments at both literal and metaphorical levels; foreshadowing function mentioned only briefly, if at all.
Visual

Minimal development

Connection between images and literal and metaphorical meanings not readily apparent; insufficient number of images; no quotes or lyrics, or those present do not add meaning to illulstration; no claim, or claim used cannot be supported by chapter; messy; does not invite viewer attention; boring.
Sufficient

Collection of images that illustrate different meanings, but inadequate differentiation between literal and metaphorical; quotes from outside sources that relate to meaning of topic;use of song lyrics that relate to topic; neat; evidence that time and planning went into production; interesting; contains claim that could be supported by chapter.
Exemplary

Sophisticated collection of images that illustrate both literal and metaphorical meanings; insightful quotes from outside sources that capture meaning of topic;creative use of song lyrics that express levels of meaning; neat; obvious evidence that time and thoughtful planning went into production; demands viewer attention and close examination; contains claim that can obviously be supported by chapter.
Writer's Memo

Minimal development

Does not address all assigned topics for memo.
Sufficient

Addresses all assigned topics for memo with use of elementary diction and syntax.
Exemplary

Explains, in sophisticated diction and syntax, the following:
Reasons why topic for visual was chosen; why elements were selected;explanation of which element best illustrates meaning of visual; goal for viewer.
MLA format,length

Minimal development

Not present due to errors: 0 points
Sufficient
Exemplary

1" margins
Header
Heading
5 space paragraph
indentations
Times New Roman, 12
Double spaced
Responses 300 wds.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n243