iRubric: EDMG699 Capstone Paper Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

EDMG699 Capstone Paper Rubric

Graduate Writing Assignment

Rubric for capstone paper

Rubric Code: N8B26B

By jamessmith53

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: (General)

Type: Writing

Grade Levels: Graduate

Graduate Level Writing Assignment R
	Exemplary 4 pts	Accomplished 3 pts	Developing 2 pts	Beginning 1 pts	Unacceptable 0 pts
Synthesis of Knowledge 20 pts	Exemplary Student exhibits a defined and clear understanding of the assignment. Thesis is clearly defined and well constructed to help guide the reader throughout the assignment. Student builds upon the thesis of the assignment with well-documented and exceptional supporting facts, figures, and/or statements.	Accomplished Establishes a good comprehension of topic and in the building of the thesis. Student demonstrates an effective presentation of thesis, with most support statements helping to support the key focus of assignment.	Developing Student exhibits a basic understanding of the intended assignment, but the thesis is not fully supported throughout the assignment. While thesis helps to guide the development of the assignment, the reader may have some difficulty in seeing linkages between thoughts. While student has included a few supporting facts and statements, this has limited the quality of the assignment.	Beginning Exhibits a limited understanding of the assignment. Reader is unable to follow the logic used for the thesis and development of key themes. Introduction of thesis is not clearly evident, and reader must look deeper to discover the focus of the writer. Student’s writing is weak in the inclusion of supporting facts or statements.	Unacceptable Chaotic or wrong
Foundations of Knowledge 20 pts Focus and/or Thesis	Exemplary Student demonstrates proficient command of the subject matter in the assignment. Assignment shows an impressive level of depth of student’s ability to relate course content to practical examples and applications. Student provides comprehensive analysis of details, facts, and concepts in a logical sequence.	Accomplished Student exhibits above average usage of subject matter in assignment. Student provides above average ability in relating course content in examples given. Details and facts presented provide an adequate presentation of student’s current level of subject matter knowledge.	Developing The assignment reveals that the student has a general, fundamental understanding of the course material. Whereas, there are areas of some concerning in the linkages provided between facts and supporting statements. Student generally explains concepts, but only meets the minimum requirements in this area.	Beginning Student tries to explain some concepts, but overlooks critical details. Assignment appears vague or incomplete in various segments. Student presents concepts in isolation, and does not perceive to have a logical sequencing of ideas.	Unacceptable No effort to explain or serious logical errors
Application of Knowledge 35 pts Critical Thinking Skills	Exemplary Student thoroughly understands and excels in explaining all major points. An original, unique, and/or imaginative approach to overall ideas, concepts, and findings is presented. Overall format of assignment includes an appropriate introduction (or abstract), well- developed paragraphs, and conclusion. Finished assignment demonstrates student’s ability to plan and organize research in a logical sequence.	Accomplished Student explains the majority of points and concepts in the assignment. Learner demonstrates a good skill level organizing material in assignment. Student presents an above average level of preparedness, with few formatting errors.	Developing Learner applies some points and concepts incorrectly. Assignment does not have a continuous pattern of logical sequencing.	Beginning Assignment reveals a lack of organization. Student presents an incomplete attempt to provide linkages or explanation of key terms.	Unacceptable No effort at synthesis, analysis, or evaluation.
Use of Examples 5 pts	Exemplary Exemplary use of examples	Accomplished Excellent use of examples	Developing Good use of examples	Beginning Poor use of examples	Unacceptable No use of examples
Writing Mechanics 5 pts	Exemplary Flawless grammar and spelling; outstanding style	Accomplished Good grammar and spelling (no more than 5 errors); good style	Developing Adequate grammar and spelling (no more than 10 errors); adequate style	Beginning Poor grammar and spelling (11 or more errors); poor writing style	Unacceptable Sub-professional level of writing
APA Formatting 5 pts	Exemplary Perfect formatting of paper, in-text citations, and References page	Accomplished No more than 5 minor formatting errors	Developing Six to 10 minor formatting errors	Beginning More than 10 minor errors or any major formatting errors	Unacceptable No attempt at APA formatting

Keywords:

rubric graduate writing

Subjects:

(General)

Types:

Writing

Discuss this rubric